Struggle for Hindu Existence

*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.

Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute: Allahabad HC fixed March 13 for next hearing.

Krishna Janmabhoomi

Allahabad High Court fixed March 13 further hearing on Mathura Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute, know what is the demand of Hindu side.

Upendra Bharti | HENB |  Lucknow | March 1, 2024:: The Allahabad high court on Thursday fixed March 13 for further hearing the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid title dispute matter. Earlier in the day, Justice Mayank Kumar Jain heard the 18 consolidated suits filed by Bhagwan Shrikrishna Virajman at Katra Keshav Dev Khewat and others.

The court is hearing the applications filed by the Muslim side under Order 7 Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code (CPC) regarding maintainability of suits. In continuation of her earlier arguments, while appearing on behalf of Muslim side through video conference, senior advocate Tasneem Ahmadi submitted before the court that suit is barred by limitation.

As per her, the parties had entered into a compromise on October 12, 1968 and the said compromise was confirmed in a civil suit decided in 1974. The limitation to challenge a compromise is three years but the suit was filed in 2020 and therefore, the present suit is barred by limitation.

It was further submitted that suit has been filed for possession after removal of structure of Shahi Idgah Masjid as well as for restoration of temple and for permanent injunction. The prayer in the suit shows that the structure of Masjid (mosque) is there and committee of management is in possession of the same.

“In this way a question/dispute has been raised on Waqf property and thus provisions of Waqf Act will apply and as such, it is the Waqf Tribunal which has the jurisdiction to hear the matter and not a civil court like the present one,” she argued.

On the earlier occasion, she had submitted before the court that the title suit is not maintainable as the same is barred by the provisions of Waqf Act as well as the Places of Worship Act 1991, which prohibits conversion of any place of worship and to provide for the maintenance of the religious character of any place of worship as it existed on August 15, 1947.

The Allahabad high court is hearing a plea regarding maintainability of a suit seeking removal of Shahi Idgah mosque in Mathura which it claims has been built on 13.37-acre land of Katra Keshav Deo temple. As per previous direction of the court, senior advocate Manish Goyal appeared as amicus curiae before the court.

On December 14, 2023, the high court had allowed a court-monitored survey of the Shahi Idgah complex and agreed to the appointment of an advocate commissioner to oversee the survey of the mosque premises, which the petitioners claim holds signs suggesting that it was a Hindu temple once.

Subsequently, this order was challenged by the mosque management committee before the Supreme Court, which stayed the order dated December 14, 2023, regarding the survey of the mosque complex adjoining the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple.

Although the SC stayed the implementation of the high court’s December 14 order, the apex court made it clear that the proceedings before the high court in the dispute including the maintainability of the suit under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code will continue.

In May last year, the high court transferred to itself all cases related to the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid dispute pending before the civil court of Mathura.

The Muslim side has also presented arguments regarding the agreement made in 1968, saying that under this, 13.7 acres of land of Keshav Dev Katra has been given to the Shahi Idgah Mosque. The Muslim side has also cited the Places of Worship Act 1991 and the Limitation Act, Specific Possession Act and Wakf Act.  A single bench of Justice Mayank Kumar Jain is hearing the case.

Demand to hand over the disputed premises to the Hindu side

After deciding the maintainability petition, the Hindu petitioners filed a demand of an Amin survey of the disputed premises. Allahabad High Court is hearing 18 applications simultaneously. On the lines of the Ayodhya dispute, the case is being heard directly in the High Court instead of the district court. In most of the applications, there has been a demand to hand over the Shahi Idgah Mosque to the Hindus, terming it as a religious place for Hindus.The Hindu sides are also contemplating to place the demand of a scientific survey of Archeological Survey of India (ASI)  in the ;line of Gyanvapi. But, a RTI reply from ASI in recent cast a light for the assertion of a Hindu temple in Mathura that was destroyed by Mughal king Aurangzeb’s decree in 1670.

Aurangzeb demolished temple at site of Mathura’s Krishna Janmabhoomi complex: ASI

In response to an RTI query, ASI has disclosed information based on historical records of a 1920 gazette about Mathura’s Krishna Janmabhoomi temple complex. Attaching an excerpt from the Nov 1920 gazette, the ASI stated in its response:

“Portions of Katra mound which are not in the possession of nazul tenants on which formerly stood a temple of Keshavdev which was dismantled and the site utilised for the mosque of Aurangzeb…”, the RTI response of ASI tells.

In this connection, Hindu side’s advocate Mahendra Pratap Singh  is likely to  place the key piece of evidence before Allahabad HC and SC, accordingly.

“On basis of historical evidence, we had in our petition mentioned that Aurangzeb issued a decree in 1670 CE to demolish the temple. Following that, Shahi Idgah Mosque was built there Now ASI in reply to the RTI query has attested the information. We’ll put forward ASI reply in HC during the Feb 22 hearing,” Singh said.

__Inputs from ABP News.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow Struggle for Hindu Existence on WordPress.com

Blog Stats

  • 9,060,638 hits

Follow Struggle for Hindu Existence on WordPress.com

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning

  1. Sajal Majumdar's avatar
  2. Unknown's avatar
  3. hinduexistence's avatar