Struggle for Hindu Existence

*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity *Join us in Hindu Freedom Movement *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari

Islam in India

Islam in India : Revealing the Truth.

Islamic Terrorism in India

Islamic Threats in India.

(weak hearts must not see it).

Love Jihad in India.

Pakistani Plan to Convert India as Islamistan.

Pak-Islamic Strategy to conquer India and finish all the Hindus in India.

The Final fall of Islam.

~ Upananda Brahmachari.

One may write many things about it. One can research and prepare a doctoral thesis. But I have not the time so far. So, I am to tell three points about it gives some hints only, though I am telling only about Radical Islam, the only root-cause of Jehadi mayhem, murder, brutality, insanity, insurgency all in the name of Insane Allah and his Brutal  Prophet.

Points are:

1. The seed of destruction of Islam is naturally produced from its Jihad fruit.

2.  Those immature persons think that Islam is invincible, actually  they did not find the track record of Islam which won over the comparatively weaker and unorganized sections and was drastically defeated by the stronger and organized.

3.  The lust, greed, betray, terror, fanaticism, primitiveness cannot bear a sign of humane advancement so far as all these vices are enshrined and  explained in Quran as easy take for which all the followers of Quran are seen  as a type of animal, seeking darkness and hiding into deserts, forest, dens etc.  farthest from the human society.

Expected ensnarement may be possible in due course of action with a streamlining of reformation many things both within and outside.

In this perspective we have to do only three things.

  1. Cut the Jihad tree that must not produce any poisonous Jihad fruit.
  2. Be stronger than Muslims and organized without any internal conflict.
  3. Expose so-called Holy Quran and restrict those portions which spread unholy hatred, terror, war, destruction, contradiction and animality so that a chance may come forth to extract the philanthropic part from it through revision and reformation.

Advancement, the symbol modern society must be connected with spirituality. Without spirituality a man is animal. The spirit of Radical Islam without spirituality gradually runs an odd evolution (devaluation) ~ man to animal. We have to keep a distance from the rage of those animals and have to do the same as we do different for domestic and wild one. And whoever indulged into primitiveness or darkness without logical aspiration found a premature demise and it still poses the same fate of final fall.

The position regarding disposal of Islam in India is also same as above.

Post Script: What is 786 in Islam? One of my friend pointed out that the Muslim clerics teach the mystery very confidentially. 786=? 7th Century: Birth. 7+8=15th Century: Peak. 7+8+6=21st Century: Fall. 786 depicts the birth, rise and fall of Islam in this encapsulated chronicle of bloodiest phases of human history.   

28 Responses to “Islam in India”

  1. Azizul Hasan said

    (1.)
    Hame har Dharm ki izzat Karni cahiye….. ye hamara farz hai hum agar masjid ki azan sunte hai, to mandiron ka bhajan bhi sunte hai hai yahi hai hindustan ki khas bat….

    Aao Desh Ka Samman Kare
    Shahido Ki Shahadat Yaad Kare
    Ek Baar Fir Se Rashtra Ki Kamaan
    Hum Hindustani Apne Haath Dhare
    Aao.. Swantantra Diwas Kaa Maan Kare…

    (2).

    Har musalman Atankwad nahi hota mere bhai me bhiek muslim hun jo Hussain Ko Cahata hai wo kabhi antankwad nahi ban sakta.. me facebook p bhi hun dekh lo profile vickyali0782@gmail.com

    Wo jis ne apny Na Na ka wada wafa kar dia
    Ghar ka ghar supard-e-KHUDA kar dia
    Nosh kar lia jis ne shahadat ka jaam
    Us “Hussain Ibne-Ali” par lakhon salam

    Shiya Kabhi Atankwad nahi ho sakta.. ye meri guaranty hai Hindustan Jindabad Hai, Aur Rahega…… Desh k gaddaron ko nikalo agar desh k liye koi help lage to batao jaan hazir hai…… Imam Husain Farmate hai k sabse pahele apne mulk ki hifazat karo……..Hamare matma Gandhi ji ne bhi unke bare me kaha hai…..

    • Shaker A true Indian said

      This is my reply to Azizul hasan
      Sabse pahle tum Shia log Musalman nahi hote, tum logon ko KAFIR ka qitab milchuka hai. Tum log kafir ho, tum logon ko chun chun kar qatam karna hai.
      Hindu hamare bhai hain who to khulam khula shirk karte hein. laikin unka mazhab unko mubarak hamara deen hamko mubarak. agar waqt aiega to Hindustan ki hifazat musalman kareinge nake shia kafir.

    • पिछले दिनों एक टी.वी शो शुरू हुआ “सत्यमेव जयते” जिसके संचालक बॉलीवुड स्टार आमिर खान है ये धरावाहिक आजकल हर किसी के बीच चर्चा का विषय बना हुआ है तथा लोगों द्वारा बहोत पसंद भी किया जा रहा है, और बहोत से लोग इस शो में जनहित के लिए SMSs के द्वारा और सीधे दान भी दे रहे हैं, यह लेख लिखने का मेरा उद्देश्य यह है की लोगों को ये जानकारी दे सकूं की उनके द्वारा दान की रही राशि का इस्तेमाल कहाँ और कैसे हों रहा है

      जिस संस्था के पास आपके द्वारा दान की गयी राशि जा रही है उसका नाम है “Humanity Trust” और इनकी वेबसाइट का पता है

      http://www.humanitytrust.com/

      इस वेबसाइट के अनुसार इस संस्था का उद्देश्य है
      :- मस्जिदों का निर्माण
      :-मुस्लिम नवयुवकों को नौकरी दिलवाने में सहायता करना
      {कृपया आप स्वयं इनकी वेबसाइट पे जाकर इनके उद्देश्य पढ़ें}

      अब ध्यान देने योग्य बात ये है की दान देने वाले पूरे भारत से है जो की विभिन्न धर्मों और संप्रदायों के हैं, और यहाँ पर आप देख सकते हैं की दान की राशी सिर्फ एक की धर्म और संप्रदाय के लोगों के लिए खर्च की जा रही है.

      क्या ये अन्याय नहीं है की पहले पूरे भारत के विभिन् लोगों को भावनात्मक रूप से आकर्षित किया जा रहा है और जब भोले भाले लोग इनके जाल में फंस कर अपनी मेहनत की कमाई दान स्वरुप ये समझ के दे देते हैं की ये किसी जनहित के काम में लगाई जायेगी, बिना ये जाने की उनके दिए गए पैसों का क्या होगा, ये लोग उनके दिए गए धन को साम्पदायिक कामों में इस्तेमाल कर रहे हैं?

      मैं बस ये प्रश्न कर रहा हूँ की आखिर मस्जिद और मदरसे बनाने से हमारे देश का क्या भला होने वाला है? और यदि कोई भला नहीं होने वाला है तो फिर हमारे देश के लोगों को इस तरह मूर्ख बनाने और उनको धोखा देने के इस षड़यंत्र पर क्यों कोई प्रश्न नहीं करता? क्यों सब शांत बैठे हुए है ?
      क्या भारत में सिर्फ मुस्लिम युवकों को ही नौकरी की जरूरत है या सिर्फ मुस्लिम ही बेरोजगार हैं ? यदि नहीं तो फिर इस तरह से भेदभाव क्यों ?

  2. NARESH said

    प्रिय प्रभुजी निचे का ARTICLE जरूर पड़ना , के
    मुस्लमान लोगों के द्वारा हिन्दू लोगों पे कितना
    अत्याचार हुआ था , होश उड़ जायेगा

    http://islammonitor.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3312:islams-indian-slave-trade-part-i-in-islams-genocidal-slavery-&catid=170&Itemid=67

    http://www.islam-watch.org/articles.htm
    EVER Islam’s Indian slave trade (Part i) in Islam’s genocidal slavery:
    part I.
    Tuesday, 23 February 2010 00:00

    Indian Kingdoms ca 6th Century AD (Modern names added as a reference)
    India has a deep, long cultural history. Hinduism began there around 1,500
    BC and Buddhism around the 6th century BC. This culture had evolved
    impressive intellectual, religious and artistic pursuits. Pre and post the
    early days of Islam, Indian scholars took their works in science, maths
    (zero, algebra, geometry, the decimal system, so-called ‘Arabic’ numbers are
    actually Hindu ones!), medicine, philosophy etc to the courts of others
    (including Muslims eg Baghdad).

    Others came to study in India’s established universities. Indian children
    (boys and girls) were educated in the relatively widespread education system
    in a wide variety of subjects eg science, medicine and philosophy. India’s
    art and architecture was magnificent. They were a prosperous people. Then
    came Islam – slaughter, slavery, rape, violence, pillage; destruction of
    religious sites, art and architecture; poverty, exploitation, humiliation,
    famine, forced conversion, decline in intellectual pursuits, social
    destruction and a worsening of social ills. To Islam, anything that is not
    Islamic is from a time of ignorance –Jahiliyya- and must be destroyed (or
    appropriated and called Islam’s!). The onslaught created the Roma
    (gypsies), destroyed ‘Hindu’ Afghanistan and formed Pakistan (Kashmir) and
    Bangladesh .

    The cost of the Muslim invasions is massive in lives, wealth and culture.
    Estimates suggest that 60-80 MILLION died at the hands of Muslim invaders
    and rulers between 1000 and 1525 alone (ie over 500 years-the population
    FELL). (Lal cited in Khan p 216) Impossible you think? In the war of
    Independence of Bangladesh, 1971, the Muslim Pakistani army *killed 1.5-3
    million people* (mainly Muslims …) in just 9 MONTHS. (Khan p 216). The
    world looked the other way—but don’t we always when it’s Muslims committing
    the violence!

    Based on the figures that are available, the number of Indians enslaved is
    enormous!

    Three articles cover India: *Part I *concentrates on slavery while *parts J
    and K *examine the Islamic jihad against India not as a list of battles but
    as a record of the need by pious Muslims to exterminate idolatry and
    polytheism and make India ‘Muslim’ as expressed in their own memoirs and the
    writings of Muslim historians.

    Click on the image to learn more about the book

    The Muslim conquest of India was probably the bloodiest in history:

    The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with utmost glee and pride
    of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women
    and children to slave-markets, and the destruction of temples carried out by
    the warriors of Islam during 800AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were
    converted to Islam by the sword in this period” (historian Durant cited in
    Khan p 201)

    And Rizwan Salim (1997) writes what the Arab invaders really did:

    ‘ savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name,
    from Arabia and West Asia, began entering India from the early century
    onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered
    uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable forts and palaces of
    Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women.
    ………but many Indians do not seem to recognize that the alien Muslim
    marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth’s most mentally
    advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most
    vigorously creative society.”(cited in Khan p 179)

    Of course Indians pre-Islam, fought, but it was NOT the practice to enslave
    or ravage, or massacre, or destroy religious sites, or damage crops and
    farmers. Battles were usually conducted on open soil between military
    personnel. (Khan p 205-207) There was no concept of ‘booty’ so Indians were
    unprepared for Islam’s onslaught. Indigenous Indians were forced to flee to
    jungles and mountains, or face gruelling exploitation and taxes, slaughter
    or enslavement while their society was demeaned and destroyed. Muslims
    constantly attacked the indigenous, idolatrous population and also fought
    against each other in ceaseless revolts by generals, chiefs and princes
    during the entire time of Islamic rule (Khan p 205).

    *Slavery:* Initially ‘India’ included part of today’s Pakistan (Sindh),
    Bangladesh/Bengal and Kashmir. Hinduism and Buddhism flourished in
    Afghanistan pre the Islamic takeover (7th century). In the 16th century
    Afghanistan was divided between the Muslim Mogul (Mughal) Empire of India
    and the Safavids of Persia.

    The damaged armless image of the bodyguard of Shiva-Maheshwara as depicted
    at the Hoysaleshwara Temple complex at Halebid. Hindu temples and works of
    art built in the ancient were desecrated and destroyed by Muslims invaders.
    Initially the godless Umayyads, allowed Hindus dhimmi status – possibly
    because of their large numbers, resistance to Islam and their value as a
    source of tax income. This violates Islamic text and law which demands
    death or conversion for idolaters and polytheists. When Sultan Iltutmish
    (d 1236) was asked why Hindus weren’t given the choice between death and
    Islam, he replied:

    “but at the moment in India…the Muslims are so few that they are like salt
    (in a large dish) …however after a few years when in the capital and the
    regions and all the small towns, when the Muslims are well established and
    the troops are larger….it would be possible to give Hindus the choice of
    death or Islam” (cited in Lal [c] p 538) (Can we learn anything from
    this???)

    Despite their supposed ‘dhimmi’ status, mass slaughter, mass forced
    conversion and mass enslavement with the resulting forced conversion to
    Islam were practised throughout Islamic rule and into the 20th century as
    many demanded *the idolaters/polytheists convert or die. Hindu fighters and
    males were slaughtered with women and children enslaved. Eunuch slaverywas
    practised on young boys. *

    Often actual numbers aren’t given, just comments like ‘*countless
    captives/slaves,’ or ‘all the women and children were taken.’* Where
    numbers are recorded, they are terrifying. Along with people, the Muslims
    took everything they could—coins, jewels, cloths, clothes, furniture, idols,
    animals, grain etc or destroyed it.

    Muslim rulers were foreigners. Until the 13th century, most slaves were sent
    out of India but following the Sultanate of Delhi (1206) they were retained
    to work for the sultanate, sold in India or sent elsewhere. Slaves from
    elsewhere were imported and Muslim armies were composed of a wide array of
    foreign slave groups ‘converted’ to Islam and ‘Hindus’ and Indian
    ‘converts.’
    Slaves were the promised booty from allah and obtaining them was a strong
    motivation for jihad.

    “slaves were so plentiful that they became very cheap; men…were
    degraded….but this is the goodness of god, who bestows honours on his own
    religion and degrades infidelity”. (Muslim chronicler Utbi on Sultan
    Subuktigin of Ghazni’s slave raid [942-997] in Sookdheo p166)

    In Sindh (first area attacked successfully) the early ‘Muslim’ community was
    composed mainly of slaves forced into Islam and a small number of Arab
    masters (Khan p 299). Initially slaves were forced out of India eg Qasim
    (Arab), the conquerer of Sindh sent by Hajjaj bin Yusuf Sakifi in the
    caliphate of Walid I, took 300,000 from a 3 year campaign in 712-715 (Khan
    p 299, Trifkovic p 109). Muslim fighters came from everywhere to partake
    in this *‘jihad.*’ *Qasim was suddenly recalled and executed (possibly by
    being sown in an animal’s hide) for supposedly violating 2 Sindhi princesses
    destined for the caliph’s harem!!** *(Lal [c] p 439)

    Many raids taking slaves were carried out under various caliphs in the 8th
    and 9th century.

    *The Ghaznivids-Turks from Ghazni, Afghanistan (997-1206) who subdued the
    Punjab.*
    From 17 raids (997-1030) *Sultan Muhmud Ghazni* (Turk from Afghanistan,
    997-1030) sent hundreds of thousands of slaves to Ghanzi (Afghanistan)
    resulting in a *loss of about 2 million people via slaughter or enslavement
    and sale outside India *(Khan p 315). Chroniclers (eg Utbi, the sultan’s
    secretary) provide some numbers eg -from Thanesar, the Muslim army brought
    200,000 captives back to Ghazni (Afghanistan). In 1019, 53,000 were taken.
    At one time the caliph’s 1/5th share was 150,000 suggesting 750,000
    captives. 500,000 were taken in one campaign (at Waihind)(Lal [c] p 551)
    Mahmud’s secretary al-Utbi records:

    Mahmud of Ghazni Mahmud of Ghazni (971-1030) was the first sultan of the
    Ghaznavid dynasty in Afghanistan.

    “Swords flashed like lightening amid the blackness of clouds, and fountains
    of blood flowed like the fall of setting star. The friends of god defeated
    their opponents….the Musalmans wreaked their vengeance on the infidel
    enemies of god killing 15,000 of them…making them food of the beasts and
    birds of prey….god also bestowed on his friends such an amount of booty as
    was beyond all bounds and calculations, including 500,000 slaves beautiful
    men and women” (Khan p 191)

    The Ghaznivid’s ruled in the ‘Islamic sultanate of the Punjab’ till 1186.
    Attacks in Kashmir, Hansi, and districts of the Punjab resulted in mass
    slaughter and enslavement eg 100,000 in a 1079 attack in the Punjab (Tarik
    –i-Alfi in Khan p 276-7, Lal [d] p 553).

    *The Gaurivid invasion: The Delhi Sultanate 1206-1526) Turks who conquered
    northwestern India, and the Gangetic valley. *
    1)Under the Ghaurivid rulers (Turks) eg *Muhammad Ghauri* (Afghani) and his
    military commander then ruler, *Qutbuddin Aibak* (r1206-1210), the Delhi
    sultanate was set up. Mass beheadings, enslavements, forced conversions,
    plunder and the destruction of temples continued. Slaves were incredibly
    plentiful. In 1195, Aibak took 20,000 slaves from Raja Bhim and 50,000 at
    Kalinjar (1202) (Lal [c] p 536).

    “even the poor (Muslim) householder became owner of numerous slaves.’ (Khan
    103, Lal [c] p 537).

    Muhammad Ghori,Mohammad Ghauri, etc., originally named Muizz-ad-din, b.1162
    – d.1206, was a Ghurid emperor and the governor of Ghazni from 1173 to 1206.
    Following the formation of the Delhi Sultanate (1206) *slavery and attacks
    across India **escalated from the Delhi base. * Slave trading centres
    operated in India selling slaves to merchants and ordinary Muslims. Slaves
    could be taken anywhere. While 1/5 of the booty including slaves was
    nolonger automatically sent to the caliph, slaves were still sent at times
    to Caliphs and other prominent Muslims and as gifts eg to China.

    2) *Sultan Iltutmish* (d 1236) continued to enslave and force Islam onto
    slaves (Lal [c] p 538). The ‘slave’ commander Ulugh Khan *Balban*
    (1250s-1260s) took so many captives they ‘couldn’t be counted.’ A chronicler
    records –

    “all the infidel’s wives, sons and dependents…and children ..fell into the
    hands of the victors.” (Chronicler in Lal [c] p 538)

    At Katehar, Balban ordered a *general massacre of the male population OVER 8
    years of age* and carried away women and children (Lal [c] p 539).

    Throughout ‘Hindustan’ towns and villages were raided, people enslaved in
    droves. Hindus returned to villages decimated by fire and sword but the
    Turkish Muslim armies returned (Lal [c] p 539). Slaves were lost forever!

    3) *Rule by the Kiljis (1290-1320) and Tughlaqs (1320- 1413).*
    Through the 13/14th century ruled by the Khilji (Khaljis) and Tughlaq’s,
    slavery grew as Islam spread. Thousands of slaves were sold at a low price
    everyday (Khan p 280). *Alauddin Khilji’s* (r 1296-1316) capture of slaves
    was stupendous and he shackled, chained and humiliated slaves (Lal [c] p
    540). In the sack of Somnath alone he:

    “took captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens, amounting to
    20,000 and children of both sexes ..more than the pen can enumerate. The
    Mohammadan army brought the country to utter ruin, destroyed the lives of
    inhabitants, and plundered the cities and captured their offspring.” (historian
    cited in Bostom p 641, Lal [c] p 540)

    Many thousands were massacred. Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000
    slave BOYS in his personal service and 70,000 slaves worked continuously on
    his buildings.(Lal [c] p 541)

    Women practised *Jauhar* (burning or killing oneself to avoid enslavement
    and rape) and *sati*.

    The Sufi Amir Khusrau notes “the Turks, whenever they please, can seize, buy
    or sell any Hindu” (Lal [c] p 541)

    ALA-UD-DIN-KHILJI extended the boundaries of the Delhi Sultanate and brought
    almost the whole of India under his rule.

    The slave markets had a continuous supply of slaves eg Delhi. A Hindu
    chronicle of the end of the 13th/early 14th century notes violent campaigns
    across extensive areas which resulted in death or enslavement of
    perhaps *millions
    of Hindus.* It reports instructions to Turkish Muslim invaders (ie to Gori
    Malik in the sack of Bhinmal) to*spread terror, cut down the Brahmanas, and
    kill cows*. The Turks enslaved, ransacked and burnt (Bostom p 643-4)

    *Muhammad Tughlaq’s (r 1325-1351)* enslavement of others outstripped
    Alauddin Khilji.
    Commentators write:

    “The Sultan never ceases to show the greatest zeal in making war upon
    infidels….everyday thousands of slaves are sold at a very low price, so
    great is the number of prisoners.” (Lal [c] p 541)

    *Sultan Firoz Shah Tughlaq (1351-1388)* had 180,000 slaves (he collected
    young males) including 40,000 guards of his palace. He told his
    fief-holders and officers to capture slaves whenever they were at war and
    send him the best. (Sookdheo p165-167, Lal [c] p 542)

    *Shams Siraj Afif*, a contemporary historian notes: “slaves became too
    numerous.” “The

    Sultan Firuz Shah Tughlaq
    institution took root in every centre of the land” and continued even when
    the sultanate fractured into kingdoms. (Lal [c] p 542)
    Traveller throughout India, *Ibn Battuta* noted that villages after villages
    were deserted (Lal [c] p 544).

    Slave trading centres for Indian slaves outside India were Khurasan, Ghazni,
    Samarkhand (Central Asia) and Kabul and Kandahar. Caravans also arrived
    there from Istanbul, Iraq, and China..(Khan p 318). Foreign slaves were
    also bought by ‘Indian’ Muslims as they were less likely to cause
    uprisings. Even in Akbar’s court (1556-1605), where some Hindus were
    employed, most were foreign (Khan p 318).

    *Timur/Tamerlane 1398/99. Destroyed the Delhi sultanate:*
    A raid by pious Timurlane (Amir Timur –a Turkic/Mogul from Central Asia) in
    1398/99 saw 100,000 slaves slaughtered in cold-blood before he attacked
    Delhi and possibly 200,000-250,000 (or more) plus craftsmen enslaved and
    taken out of India (to Samarkand, Central Asia).(Khan p 282, Lal [c] p
    544). In his memoirs on the attack on Delhi, Timur claims his 15,000 Turks
    EACH “secured from 50 to 100 prisoners……there was no man with less than
    20” and that was on just one day, the 17th! “The other booty was
    immense”…”women were obtained in such quantities as to exceed all count.”
    The areas of Delhi occupied by Muslims weren’t sacked. The slaughter, mass
    enslavement and plunder continued as he headed towards his home Samarkand,
    Central Asia. (Timur’s memoirs, Bostom p 648).

    *The Sayyid and Lodi dynasties (1400-1525)- returning the Delhi sultanate *
    Following Timur’s destruction of Turkish Muslim rule in Delhi, he installed
    others that paid tribute to him till 1506.

    *Sayyid sultans *attacked, enslaved, killed and plundered in Katehar (1422),
    Malwa (1423) and Alwar (1425)(Khan p 282)
    Then the *Lodi Sultans* (1451-1526) restored the sultanate. Nothing
    changed for the Hindus. Enslavement and slaughter by *Sultan Bahlul
    *depopulated
    Nimsar. *Sikandar Lodi* repeated this in Rewa and Gwaloir (Khan p 282).

    *Mughal rule 1526-1707.*
    1) *Jahiruddin Shah Babur* (1483-1530) defeated Lodi. Babur, known for
    his quotes from the Koran, jihad and piles of heads also enslaved women and
    children (Khan p 282-3, Lal[b] p 438-459). Leadership contests ensued.

    2) *Akbar the great (1556-1605) –Babur’s grandson*
    Raiding a village without reason and enslaving the inhabitants became common
    and, although Akbar (1556-1605) tried to stop this practice, it continued
    unabated. Most parts of India came under Akbar’s control. Illiterate
    Akbar is considered tolerant and many of his acts are contrary to Islam eg
    he rejected Islam, allowed others into his court and *attempted to
    synthesize a new composite religion called Din-i-Ilahi –religion of god* (Khan
    p 152). He adopted Hindu and Zoroastrian festivals and practices (Trifkovic
    p 112). He stopped the jizya though other taxes remained. Yet in many ways
    he remained ‘Islamic.’ While declaring independence from foreign Islamic
    overlordship he still sent ‘gifts’ to Mecca, Medina and elsewhere (Khan p
    163). *He owned slaves including thousands of women.* *He hated
    ‘paganism.’* (Note in his memoirs –‘Barburnama- Sultan Babur [1483-1530]
    noted that most of Hindustan’s inhabitants were pagans; “they call a pagan a
    Hindu”!! Bostom p 80). Thousands of peasants (30,000)(lower caste Hindus)
    in Chittor who took up arms alongside their Rajput rulers (8,000 Rajputs)
    were put to the sword or enslaved and their property taken. (Khan p 88, 113,
    Trifkovic p 112)

    “the order was given for a general massacre of the infidels as punishment
    …by mid-day nearly 2000 had been slain….those of the fortress who
    escapes the sword, men and women were made prisoners, and their property
    came into the hands of the Musulmans. The place being cleared of the
    infidels, his majesty remained there three days” (cited in Sookdheo p
    265).

    *Akbar’s sex slavery:* Akbar had 5,000 females in his harem (Khan p 102)

    While Akbar supposedly attempted to halt mass slavery in battle, it
    vigorously continued under his commanders. Chroniclers and reports record
    that raiding villages without justification and enslaving people was
    fashionable. (Khan p 283). Children were stolen, kidnapped and purchased
    then males were castrated (Islam’s famous eunuch slavery), particularly in
    Bengal. *Abdullah Khan Uzbeg,* one of Akbar’s generals boasted,

    “I made prisoners of 5 lacs (500,000) of men and women and sold them. They
    all became Muhammadans. From their progeny, there will be crores (one
    crore=10 million) by the day of judgement.”(cited in Khan p 103)

    Slave markets popped up all over India. Slaves became very cheap—everyone
    (Muslim) had several! (Khan p 316).

    A witness noted:

    “in his reign, servants and slaves were so numerous and cheap that
    everybody, even of mean fortune, keeps a great family and is splendidly
    attended’ (cited in Khan p 283)

    Akbar’s son and grandson retuned to orthodox Islam.

    3) *Jahangir *(1605-27CE Akbar’s son) wrote that 500,000-600,000 people were
    slaughtered during the combined rule of his father –Akbar- and his own!!!
    (Lal [b] p 459, Khan p 200). In 1619-20 alone he sent 200,000 Indian
    slaves to Iran for sale. Children were castrated and given as slaves to pay
    tax collectors (Khan 285)

    4) *Shah Jahan* (1628-58, Akbar’s grandson) The condition of Hindu peasants
    became unbearable—adults and children were enslaved to pay taxes (Khan p
    283-4). Yet you will read of this as the Mughal period’s greatest
    prosperity—while non-Muslim Indians were reduced to destitution. Shah
    Jahan’s religious violence; destruction of Hindu and Christian sites; offer
    of death or Islam to 4,000 at Agra while young females were sent to harems;
    slaughter of 10,000 at Hugh and *INCEST* with his daughters is reported in
    part K and Trifkovic p 112. *Shah Jahan built the Taj Mahal to his 3rd wife
    who died bearing her 14th child in 19 years! * (What a romantic!!)

    Slaves from foreign nations also flowed into India –eg Sultan Aurangzeb
    purchased Tatar and Uzbek women as harem guards (war-like) and European
    women as sex–slaves .(Khan 317)

    5) *Aurangzeb* (Akbar’s great grandson, r 1658-1707) aimed to conquer,
    enslave or convert all of India (Khan p 104). He revived Islam. Temples
    and schools were destroyed and infidels slaughtered. Islam’s dhimmitude
    laws were applied with a vengence. (Khan p 98). Hindus revolted against
    paying the jizyah. In a campaign against the Rajputs, his generals

    “employed themselves in laying waste to the country, destroying temples and
    buildings, cutting down fruit trees, and making prisoners of the women and
    children of the infidels ..” (Sookdheo p 265 –complies with jihad laws eg
    Reliance of the Traveller; Laws o9.13 – enslave women and children and
    o9.15 p 604 –OK to cut down trees and destroy buildings ).
    A French Physician living in India noted that children “were carried away as
    slaves” to pay taxes (Khan p 284)

    Slavery continued from within India and outside even though the *British,
    who halted slavery*, had begun to enter India in the 18th century:

    In 1713-1719: *Mughal Furrukhsiyar*, attacked the Sikh fortress of
    Gurdaspur in Punjab, killing thousands and sending others in collars and
    chains to the emperor (Sookdheo p 265)

    In 1738, *Nadir Shah of Iran* invaded India, slaughtered 200,000, plundered
    and enslaved, returning home with thousands of slaves, including a few
    thousand beautiful girls and immense treasure (Khan p 104, p 199).

    Reign of Terror – After his accession to the throne of Delhi, Farrukh-Siyar
    launched the sternest proceedings against the Sikhs, who had under Banda
    Singh Bahadur freed much of the Punjab from mughal rule.
    The British captured Bengal in 1757 yet Muslim rulers continued their slave
    taking around India.
    *Afghani, Ahmad Shah Abdali* attacked 3 times (1757, 1760, 1761) around
    Mattra, Delhi, Luni, winning the Third Battle of the Panipat against the
    resistant Marathas in 1761. He slaughtered hundreds of thousands, beheaded
    and burnt people alive and looted, all in accordance with Islam. Massacres
    occurred in cold blood after the battle. Severed heads were piled up and
    people enslaved -22,000 in one case. Victims were humiliated, abused and
    suffered atrocities. His prisoners were deprived of food and drink and
    paraded in long lines before being beheaded . (Khan p 104, Bostom p 657).

    Islamic violence and enslavement of others continued to the end. The last
    independent Muslim ruler *Tipu Sultan* (1750-1799), a nationalist hero for
    standing up to the British, killed 10,000 Hindus and Christians and enslaved
    7000 in his wars against Travancore. The enslaved were forced into Islam.
    A Muslim chronicler notes 70,000 Coorgis were forced into Islam. (Khan p
    200)

    The East India company passed the * Indian slavery Act V banning slavery in
    1843*—at the time slavery existed in Bengal, Madras, Bombay (Khan p 335)

    In reality there were continued attacks, abductions and rapes by Muslims.
    During the partition of India into India and Pakistan 1947, (a Muslim land
    grab), Muslims kidnapped hundreds of thousands of Hindu and Sikh women and
    married them to Muslims. In November 1947, Muslim Pathan raiders enslaved
    Hindu and Sikh girls in Kashmir and sold them in Pakistan markets (Jhelum)
    (Khan p 284). Women committed *Jauhar*—jumping into fires, jumping into a
    well, or taking poison in preference to abduction, slavery and rape. (Khan
    p 252). Non-Muslims fled to ‘India’. In an ‘ethnic/religious’ cleansing
    attempt, Muslims slaughtered, forcibly converted and enslaved particularly
    in the area that would become and became Pakistan in an effort to create a
    pure Islamic state free of polluting others. Pakistan means ‘*land of the
    pure’* and of course, only Muslims are pure! (see detail, part K)

    Today in Pakistan and Bangladesh (separated from Pakistan in 1971, formerly
    East Pakistan/East Bengal), Hindu, Sikh, Jain and Christian girls etc are
    abducted, raped and forced into Islam. Literally millions of non-Muslims
    have fled to India.

    *Hunting those that fled the Islamic conquest: Islam’s sadism:*
    Those resisting Islamic control, enslavement, rape and those whose entire
    property and family had been taken (rich or poor) or were unable to meet
    crushing taxes , had fled to the jungles. Islam never had complete control
    and millions resisted –they were not subjects (Khan p 98-99). People left
    the land resulting in famines killing thousands. Some became robbers.
    Several Muslim rulers hunted people referred to as bandits and rebels
    (Muwattis), slaughtering the males and enslaving their women and children or
    slaughtering them too as Islamic law allows if they ‘resist’ (Reliance of
    the Traveller, Law o9.10 p 603).

    Sultan Tipu

    Eg under *Ghiyasuddin Balban* (r 1265-85) as he cleared the jungles and
    areas around Delhi:

    “the blood of the rioters ran in streams, heaps of slain were to be seen
    near every village and jungle and the stench of the dead reached as far as
    the Ganges” (Khan p 250)

    Muslim traveller *Ibn Buttuta*(about 1345) witnessed SADISM towards Hindu
    prisoners and their wives and children under Sultan Ghayasuddin (Ghiyath
    al-Din)

    “All the infidels found in the jungle were taken prisoners; they had stakes
    sharpened at both ends and made the prisoners’ carry them on their
    shoulders. Each was accompanied by his wife and children and they were thus
    led into the camp……. In the morning, the Hindus who were made prisoners
    the day before, were divided into four groups, and each of these was led to
    one of the four gates of the main enclosure. There they were *impaled on
    the posts* they had themselves carried. Afterwards their *wives were
    butchered and tied to the stakes by their hair. The children were massacred
    on the bosoms of their mothers, and their corpses left there.* Then they
    struck camp and started cutting down trees in another forest, and all the
    Hindus who were made captive were treated in the same manner” (translation
    of Buttuta’s notes quoted in Bostom p644, also Sookdheo p 263, )

    An 80 year old leader was apparently treated well until they had taken
    everything from him , then they killed him and stuffed his skin with straw
    and hung it on a wall!! (Sookdheo p 263) (note this is during the ‘Turkish’
    rule of India, a century BEFORE Vlad 111Dracula [1431-1476] spent his youth
    as a Turkish/Ottoman hostage see part G)
    .
    *Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq *(1325-51) hunted the jungle hideouts:

    “the whole of that country was plundered and laid waste and the *heads of
    the Hindus were brought in and hung upon the ramparts* of the fort of
    Baran” (cited in Khan p 251)

    *Babur *(1483-1540) noted the rebelliousness of the people who hid in the
    jungles. He wrote of his arrival in Agra:

    “neither grain for ourselves or corn for our horses was to be had. The
    villagers out of hostility and hatred to us, had taken to thieving and
    highway robbery; there was no moving on the roads….All the inhabitants had
    run away to jungles in terror.”(Khan p 95).

    But he slaughtered making piles of bodies and heads (Babur’s memoirs in
    Bostom p 651-3)

    *Emperor Jahangir* hunted such rebels, enslaving and sending 200,000
    (1619-20) to slave markets in Iran on one occasion (Khan p 251). A
    traveller in India (1612-14) noted Jahangir’s wealth and the extreme poverty
    of ordinary people.

    *Creating the Roma or Roma chave people:*
    Roma can mean man and Roma chave means sons of the Indian god Rama. Many
    people fled India to avoid enslavement or conversion –they are the Romanies
    or gypsies of today found throughout Europe (Hitler killed them too) and the
    US. Gypsy legends give their origin as India. *‘Researches based on their
    language, customs, rituals, and physiogonomy affirm that it is Hindus from
    India who form the bulk of these people in Europe.’* (Lal [a] p451).
    Their 1st exodus seems to have occurred around the 7th century, coinciding
    with the Arab invasion of Sind. *Mahmud Ghazni* took them away in every
    campaign (997-1030) . The biggest group exited across Afghanistan to Europe
    in the 12th and 13th centuries following the defeat of Prithviraj Chauhan
    by *Muhammad Ghauri*. THEY ARE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE, and skilled
    craftspeople with a remarkable talent for music. (Lal [a] p 451-2)

    *Slave uses: forced to serve Islam while Indian culture was trashed. *What
    true Indian can tolerate this?
    The slave armies of the Sultanate had Turks, Persians, Seljuks, Oghus (Iraqi
    Turkmen), Afghans and Khiljis and black slaves . When the *Khilji’s* came
    to power (1290-1320), the first non-slave rulers of India, enslaved and
    forcibly converted Indians appeared in the army, despite objections, because
    they feared an attack from outside India. They had just ousted the previous
    ‘Turkish’ rule and couldn’t trust the loyalty of any in the army! *Sultan
    Firoz Tughlaq *(r 1351-88) fearing attack by Islamized Mongols, allowed some
    Hindus into the army.

    Indian soldiers, generally converted slaves with the lowest rank, cared for
    animals (elephants, horses) and performed personal service to higher ranks.
    They cleared jungles, made roads, set up camp and were in the front line of
    attacks to absorb the initial blows. Escape was impossible. Very few
    converted slaves rose to prominent position through valour and loyalty to
    the Muslim ruler (Khan p 304). .

    Particularly following the formation of the Delhi sultanate (1206) many
    slaves were retained in India, employed in every possible occupation –from
    cleaning up filth, labouring, cutting jungles to playing music and singing
    (Lal [d] p 553) They were forced to build mosques, minarets and palaces
    using the materials from destroyed religious sites, libraries or monasteries
    etc of their own. The ‘*might of Islam’ mosque (Qwat-ul-islam) in Delhi* is
    built over an idol temple and uses materials from 27 destroyed Hindu and
    Jain temples. Likewise for *Deli’s Qutb Minar minaret* where the wonderful
    sculptured Hindu figures on the stones are defaced or upside down or
    concealed (Khan p 299-300)

    Slaves worked in royal karkhana (factories or workhouses) particularly in
    the Sultanate and Mogul periods. They made everything from gifts, saddles,
    textiles, weapons…thousands were involved (Khan p 305)

    Slaves served at court minded wives and concubines (Akbar, Jahangir and *Shah
    Jahan* had 5,000-6,000 women each in 1556-1658). Slaves were guards and
    administrators. Slaves danced, sang, played musical instruments, cared for
    hunting and food animals and were physicians. *Sultan Muhammad Shah Tughlaq
    * had 1,200 physicians and 10,000 falconers plus 1,000 slave musicians who
    taught music (Khan p 306).

    As usual, females and young boys provided *sexual services*. A Dutchman
    visiting India in the 17th century noted the sexual indulgence of Muslim
    rulers and noblemen who were pampered and entertained by concubines and
    wives and *freely ‘enjoyed’ the concubines in the presence of the wife* (Khan
    p310)
    In the Sindh (Bahawalpur), before it was incorporated into Pakistan (1954),
    the last Nawab had over 390 women and needed a wide range of tools to
    satisfy them eg 600 dildos (Khan p 311)

    Huge numbers of slaves were involved in building—eg 70,000 for *Sultan
    Alauddin Khilji (1296-1316)*. Building great monuments to themselves never
    stopped as when one ruler died or was removed, the successor built his own
    new monuments and palaces eg abandoning Iltutmish’s old city, *Sultan
    Ghiysuddin Balban (r1265-85)* built the Qasr-i-Lal (Red Fort) in Delhi.
    Delhi was a series of cities built by different Muslim rulers.
    *Sultan Firoz Tughlaq *(r1351-1388) had 180,000slaves. Of these a
    contingent of masons and builders with 12,000 slaves may have been involved
    in stone cutting alone! (Khan p 301). The buildings constructed during
    Islamic rule were designed and built by skilled Indian slave craftsmen,
    artisans and labourers at all levels, watched over by Muslim masters with
    whips (Korrah) (Khan p 301).

    *Suffering slaves:*
    *Humiliation and cruelty:* When *Sultan Mahmud* (997-1030) brought Hindu
    King Jaipal of Kabul to Ghanzi and subjected him to extreme humiliation,
    Jaipal jumped into a fire. (Khan p 291). *Balban *(about 1260) brought
    Hindu leading men and men of position, bound, shackled and chained to Delhi
    where *Sultan Nasiruddin* had the leading men executed –rendering others
    ‘tamed.’ (Lal [c] p 542) As we have seen many times in this series, Islam
    does everything to strip others of their dignity, equality, honor and
    self-respect. The excessive Jizya tax is paid in a public humiliation
    procedure.

    People were caught via lassos or ropes dragged around groups. They were
    tied, sometimes with iron shackles on the feet, sometimes around the neck
    and chained –until their spirit was broken and they were forcibly converted
    but they remained slaves. People capable of bearing arms were beheaded (Lal
    [d] p 552) . They were hit around the neck (no doubt reminding them they
    could be beheaded as they do when kafirs pay the jizya), forced on brutally
    long marches, exposed to the burning sun during the day and freezing cold at
    night, starved and given little water. Children were separated from
    parents. People writhed in agony and wailed (15th century report in Lal [c]
    p 543, Khan p 292)

    *Eunuchs:* All over the Islamic world, the conquered were castrated,
    including in India. This was done so men could guard harems, provide carnal
    indulgence for rulers, give devotion to the ruler as they had no hope of a
    family of their own and of course, this quickly reduced the breeding stock
    of the conquered. Castration was a common practice throughout Muslim rule
    possibly contributing to the DECLINE in India’s population from 200 million
    in 1000 CE to 170 million in 1500 CE (Khan p 314)

    Once *Sultan Bakhtiyar Khilji *conquered Bengal in 1205, it became a leading
    supplier of castrated slaves. This remained the case into the Mogul period
    (1526-1857).
    Akbar the Great (1556-1605) owned *eunuchs*. Said Khan Chaghtai owned 1,200
    eunuchs (an official of Akbar’s son Jahangir)! In Aurangzeb’s reign, in
    1659 at Golkunda (Hyderabad), *22, 000 boys were emasculated* and given to
    Muslim rulers and governors or sold. (Khan 313).

    *Sultan Alauddin Khilji* (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 boys in his personal
    service; *Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq* (r1325-51) had 20,000 and *Sultan Firoz
    Tughlaq* (r 1351-1388) had 40,000 (Firoz Tulghlaq liked to collect boys in
    any way and had 180,000 slaves in total (Lal [c] p 542). Several
    commanders under various sultans were eunuchs. Muslim historians record
    the ‘infatuation’ of sultans *Mahmud Ghazn*i, *Qutbuddin Aiba**k*, and
    *Sikandar
    Lodi* –for *handsome young boys!* *Sultan Mahmud* was infatuated by his
    Hindu commander Tilak (Khan p 314)

    *Islam’s impact: *
    1) *Worsening of social ills: *
    In an effort to avoid enslavement and rape certain social ills increased
    and new ones developed.
    a) *Sati:* where a wife throws herself on the funeral pyre was commendable
    but not compulsory in Indian society. This possibly increased during Muslim
    invasions when many men were killed and women left vulnerable.

    b) *Child marriage:* Girls were betrothed to young Hindu boys to protect
    the girls from Muslim predators…The British also attempted to stop this
    practice (Khan p 253)

    c) *Caste system*: Egalitarian Islam is a lie—the low caste who converted
    were still despised by upper ranks of Muslims and couldn’t enter mosques etc
    and this continues today eg ‘Bengal’ (Khan p 249-250). Many lower caste
    Indians were the strongest fighters against Islam which is a very white Arab
    supremacist, apartheid system.

    Nehru notes Islam: “made its caste system, which still had an element of
    flexibility in it, more rigid and fixed’ (Khan p 250)
    Under Islam the lower castes increased as people were stripped of their
    wealth and position right down to farmers whose property was taken while
    people were subjected to crushing taxes –hence many were pushed to the
    lowest level.

    These began under Islam, but stopped under British rule.
    d) *Jauhar:*–unknown in pre-Islamic India. The earliest record occurs in the
    Chachnama by Muslim chronicler al-Kufi (Bostom p 81). Hindu women committed
    suicide by jumping into the fire (or other acts) to avoid enslavement and
    sexual violation by Muslims. When Qasim conquered Sindh, palace women set
    themselves on fire (Fort at Raor) (Lal [a] p 438). In Chittor jauhar
    occurred 3 times at least eg 1303 under attack by Alauddin Khilji, again in
    1535 under attack by Bahadur Shah of Gujarat and in 1568 under attack by
    Akbar (possibly 8,000 women) Even in the time of partition into India and
    Pakistan (1947), it occurred again as non-Muslims eg Hindus were attacked
    (Khan p 252).

    e) *Thuggee cult* (Thags): these were a religio-cultural cult of the
    goddess Kali who engaged in night-time robbery and murder. The British
    eradicated them through selective assassination, infiltration, police work
    and offering clemency for those who surrendered and cooperated.
    In the reign of Feroz Shah Khilji (1290-96) reports record him capturing
    1000 Thags —the cult seems to have developed following the Islamic
    invasion and devastation.
    Reports from others pre-Islam eg visitors from China, suggest that such
    crime was not the case pre-Islam. (Khan p 255)

    While the British removed or attempted to remove these social ills and
    stopped enslavement, Muslims not only failed to stop social ills but
    worsened them. Indeed slavery and rape; child marriage; violence to women
    and to children who don’t pray, violence to non-Muslims; taking the property
    of non-Muslims; and an apartheid system of Muslim/non-Muslim, Male/female,
    white Arab/black Indian and many other ‘delights’ are part of Islam’s text,
    laws and ‘culture.’

    2) *Cultural, artistic and religious destruction; Backwardness and
    destruction of learning.*
    Even Nehru who gives a rosy picture of Islam noted:

    “The Moslems who came to India from outside brought no new technique or
    political or economic structure. In spite of a religious belief in the
    brotherhood of Islam, they were class bound and feudal in outlook. In
    technique and in the methods of production and industrial organisation, they
    were inferior to what prevailed in India..” (cited in Khan p 185)

    Nehru noted the *Muslims didn’t build one good college in 8 centuries!**
    (Khan p 248)*

    *Despite being a creative and learned population initially, India made no
    notable contribution to science, philosophy and literature during Islamic
    rule* (Khan p 249). Pre-Islamic control, India had significant achievements
    in science, mathematics (zero, algebra, geometry, decimal system),
    literature, philosophy, medicine, astronomy, architecture and music.
    Pre-Islam’s arrival eg in 630-650s a Chinese pilgrim describes Indian boys
    and girls from age 7 studying grammar, science of arts and crafts, medicine,
    logic, and philosophy and that primary education was relatively
    widespread. Muslim Caliphs hired Indian mathematicians and physicians who
    set up hospitals and medical schools in Baghdad. (Khan p 201-204).
    Muslims from Baghdad came to Taxila (Takshashila) University to study
    medicine. Muslim students and others came to India to learn science,
    mathematics, medicine, pharmacology, toxicology and more. The large number
    of reputed universities were eventually all destroyed by Muslims. At
    times Hindus rebuilt temples and returned to teaching only to have them
    repeatedly destroyed. Muslims set up madrassas for Muslims.

    In 770, an Indian scholar brought two highly important mathematical works to
    Baghdad eg *Brahmasiddhanta* (Sindhind to Arabs) by the great 7th century
    Indian mathematician Brahmagupta –a mathematician and astronomer –which
    contained early ideas of *algebra. * The second manuscript contained a
    revolutionary system of *denoting number and the concept of zero*. In the
    9th century, Muslim Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi took this work, combined
    it with Greek geometry (The Greek contribution in science, medicine,
    philosophy is huge), to become what we call today as algebra. Indian
    numerals were used by al-Khwarizmi in algorithms (a Latinized version of his
    name) to solve certain mathematical problems. Hence Muslims may have
    contributed but they certainly did not discover either zero or algebra and
    our so-called ‘Arabic Numerals’ are actually Indian (Hindu) Numerals.(Khan p
    202) In Brahmagupta’s Khandakhadyaka (Arkanda), Arabs first became
    acquainted with a scientific system of astronomy in the 8th century. Books
    of medicine, toxicology, philosophy, chemistry and more were also taken into
    the Islamic world and translated. Indian mathematics became wide spread.
    Even a Spanish Muslim (11th century) praised the Indians for their superior
    knowledge in astronomy, mathematics, medicine, pharmacology, chemistry…
    .(Khan p 203-4). (Note Mayans also developed zero long before Islam entered
    the world!)

    India’s greatest mathematical system, the *decimal system *used today was
    the work of 3 great mathematicians—Bhashkaracharya and his daughter,
    Lilavati, and Brahmagupta.
    Marco polo noted the praiseworthy female Rudramani Devi who ruled Telugu for
    40 years (Khan p 255).

    *Islam drove women into their homes and under the veil *(Nehru in Khan p
    255).

    As Islam spread Indian culture was debased and degraded. Centres of
    learning and libraries were destroyed. To Islam, everything else is
    jahiliyya (ignorance). Brahmans were accused of teaching ‘wicked sciences’ so
    schools and temples were constantly destroyed (Khan p 199)

    *Alberuni* (973-1050), a Persian scholar captured by Sultan Mahmud Ghazni
    (r 997-1030) was brought to India and travelled for 20 years studying Indian
    mathematics, philosophy, civil and religious law, geography, religion,
    astronomy (knowledge of the distance to planets, solar and lunar eclipses),
    physics and metaphysics and also India’s geography (cities etc) and
    customs. He wrote detailed books about these which informed invaders and
    facilitated their attacks and subjugation of India (Lal [a] p 448). He
    recorded the Muslim conquests of India, noting:

    “Mahmud utterly ruined the prosperity of the country …..Hindu sciences
    have retired far away from those parts of the country conquered by us, and
    have fled to places which our hands cannot yet reach (recorded in his book
    1030-cited in Khan p 89, p 191, Bostom p 83, Trifkovic p 110, full quote
    part J)

    *As for art, architecture, and religion* – Muslim historians record with
    great delight the massive destruction of the religious sites of Hindus,
    Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs etc on a scale with few parallels. The destruction
    of the temple that took* 200 years to build in Mathura* is utterly
    distressing (Trifkovic p 110). Ever heard of Angkor Wat and Angkor Tom and
    the whole complex built in Cambodia? Angkor Wat was built around the
    12century to honour the Hindu god Vishnu—while in India, equally
    magnificent temple areas with their magnificent ‘human’ decoration (so
    offensive to Islam) were being destroyed! Despite being a UNESCO area, I
    fear for these and similar areas in Asia as Islam penetrates and takes
    control!

    Tragically Indian builders and artists were forced into the service of
    Islam with its endless restrictions on representations of human s and other
    animals—but some evidence of India’s fabulous art with its wonderful
    representations of people (vigorous and sensual, Trifkovic p 110) etc still
    exists and hopefully will fully revive. It’s too distressing to think of
    what was destroyed!

    What Islam has, it stole from others as the Arabian Peninsula tribes lagged
    well behind the social, political and civilisational development of India,
    Persia, Egypt and Syria (Khan p 175)(and look what happened when Islam
    arrived!!) Bringing in a watermelon doesn’t require or excuse the utter
    destruction and abuse carried out under the text and laws of Islam.

    3) *Dhimmitude, destitution and decline of native, non-Muslim Indians:*
    Indians became dhimmis subjected to extreme degradation, exploitation and
    humiliation in their own country. (see articles this site on dhimmitude in
    general and its economic, social, political and religious aspects –see Bat
    Ye’Or’s work.). Islamic text, the Pact of Umar and Islamic laws defining
    dhimmitude remain till the day of Judgement. The humiliating payment of the
    substantial jizya with its accompanying threat of death is only one of a
    mass of taxes, threats and abuses non-Muslims were subjected to. When
    scholar Qazi Mughisuddin advised Sultan Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) on
    collection of the Kharaj (land tax causing extreme economic deprivation) he
    also suggested a humiliating procedure including:

    “should the collector choose to spit into his mouth, he opens it. The
    purpose of this extreme humility on his part and the collector’s spitting
    into his mouth, is to show the extreme subservience incumbent on his class,
    the glory of Islam and the orthodox faith, and the degradation of the false
    religion (Hinduism).” (cited in Khan p 107-108).

    Exploitative taxes were used to enrich the treasury and force people into
    Islam outside mass conversion by the sword.
    Hindus became ‘serfs’ in their own land, forced to pay taxes and customs
    which considerably exceeded those required under Hindu law (Khan p 160).
    Conquests were for exploitation.

    From Qasim on, extracting jizya was a political and religious duty exacted:

    “with vigour and punctuality, and frequently with insult..” “The native
    population had to feed every Muslim traveller for 3 days and nights and had
    to submit to many other humiliations which are mentioned by Muslim
    historians” (Lal [a] p 439)

    *Sultan Alauddin Khilji* (reigned1296-1316) took 50-75% of the peasants
    produce in taxes (mainly the Kharaj) reducing peasants to bonded government
    slaves subjected to humiliation and destitution. Many sold their family to
    pay taxes or fled to the jungle (Khan p 108, 172). “The Hindu women and
    children went out begging at the doors of the Musalmans” (Sufi saint
    Shamsuddin Turk commenting on Alauddin in Khan p 191)

    During *Aurangzeb* reign (Akbar’s great grandson, r1658-1707), a European
    courtier, Niccolao Manucci, living in India noted Hindus *converted to
    avoid taxes * (Khan p 109-110).

    Eyewitnesses report in the 17th and 18th century that destitute peasants,
    their wives and children (males were castrated) were taken and sold by tax
    collectors to pay taxes. The people had become beggars in their own country
    (Khan p 88, 94, 283-4).

    Also *removal of livelihood, position and false charges were used to force
    others into Islam.* The council of Surat noted in 1668:

    “The Muhammadan would lodge a complaint to the Kazi (judge) that he had
    called the Prophet names or spoken contumaciously of their religion, produce
    a false witness or two and the poor man was forced to circumcision and made
    to embrace Islam.” (cited in Khan p 110)

    Mass slaughter, enslavement, forced conversion, castration of young boys and
    the use of females as sex/reproductive slaves producing Muslims, plus the
    entry of Muslims from elsewhere caused a fast increase in Muslims plus a
    decline in others. Violence and exploitation forced people to ‘convert.’
    Villages were deserted. The loss of people, property, farm animals and
    grain (all booty) caused poverty and famine, killing thousands of ordinary
    Hindus.

    4) * Plunder of India’s wealth.*
    India’s wealth in its people or its resources and products were taken by
    Muslims and sent to markets or Islamic centres of power eg Ghazni
    (Afghanistan) or Samarkand (Central Asia). Wealth was also sent as tribute,
    gifts and slaves for caliphs in Damascus, Baghdad, Cairo or Tashkent until
    Akbar (Mughal) and also to Islam’s holy cities of Mecca and Medina, Rum
    (Constantinople), Persia and others even in the Mughal period. *India’s
    wealth was transferred to the wider Islamic world while India was depleted
    and reduced to misery.* From Mohammad, Islamic conquests were to plunder
    and loot the wealth of the conquered and to enslave and ‘convert’ and to
    impose heavy taxes on the remaining non-Muslims to keep the treasuries
    going. Because Islam also aims to spread Islam over all, it destroys the
    culture, religions, sacred and precious objects, and history of others.

    Muslim rulers:

    “founded its luxury on India’s general poverty’ and India, under Muslim
    rule, experienced a series of famines, a fabulous death rate, …(Khan p
    262)

    A nearly contemporary account of *Mahmud Ghazni’s* attacks in India reveals
    the incredible wealth taken. At one stage Mahmud had a throne of gold and
    silver built (see the historians account Bostom p 632-639) and he rebuilt
    Ghazni costing 7 million gold coins (Lal [a] p 447)

    Endless accounts from the beginning to the end describe the slaves, gold and
    silver idols and other objects, coins, precious stones, jewellery,
    furniture, clothes, cloths, indigo, Indian steel, equipment, grain,
    livestock (for food or used in battle, farming or transport), indeed
    everything was taken and usually what was left was burnt. Dead bodies were
    stripped of decent clothes, and pockets searched for coins, jewels etc (see
    Lal, Bostom, Khan).

    *The loss of bullion (gold, silver) destabilised and devalued Indian
    currency so Indian merchants lost credit with foreign merchants. India’s
    balance of trade was also adversely affected. * India was nolonger a seller
    of raw and finished goods. Indian merchants couldn’t continue their trade.
    Some had to do deals with externally based Muslim rulers eg Mahmud of Ghazni
    (around 1012) to facilitate trade and allow caravans to travel unmolested!
    (Lal [a] p 444)
    Why would people be creative, innovative or work hard when a Muslim could
    take it all?

    5) *White Arab supremacy:*
    Indians are dark skinned and hence subjected to Islam’s hatred of black/dark
    skinned people (see Mohammad’s and Islam’s antiBlack racism. Part D in
    Islam’s genocidal slavery:.). Also, non-Arab converts to Islam are always
    second class. Islam is a white Arab supremacist ideology where converts
    must turn on their own history and culture and obliterate them, then they
    must revere Arab culture, the Arab language etc. For legitimacy, rulers
    tried to claim a relationship to the Arabs particularly to Mohammad’s tribe
    (Quraysh). *‘Well into the 20th century, the dark-skinned Nawab of
    Bahawalpur (Sindh) who had an obsession for white women for producing
    brighter children, fanatically claimed his ancestry to the Abbasid family of
    the Quraysh clan’* (Khan p 181) This same absurdity is found amongst
    non-Arab Muslim leaders in many areas over time (eg Africa).

    Hatred of black people is revealed in comments by Muslim conquerors of India
    in parts J, K which examine the jihad against India from comments made by
    the conquerors themselves or their chroniclers.

    *Conclusion: * The inhuman behaviour applied to the whole population by
    Muslims was the same whether the Muslims were Sufis, Arabs, Afghanis, Turks,
    or Mogul as all followed Islam’s laws, text and the fine example of
    Mohammad. It should also be noted that the violence and enslavement
    continued even after they had virtual control over India because the aim was
    not merely to conquer but to force all into Islam. Muslims did not come to
    join Indian society, they came to wipe it out and replace it with
    Islam—which tells them that they own everything because it’s the booty
    promised by allah. The pagans/idolaters, polytheists had to convert or die
    and only then could there be (Islamic) peace! Slaves were the just reward
    for Islam’s fighters–part of the booty promised by allah.

  3. Arya said

    Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a religion of lies and the claim that Islam is a religion of peace is one of those lies. There are hundreds of verses in the Quran where Muhammad enjoins fighting on his followers. He himself launched 78 raids in the last ten years of his life. When he felt he was strong, he gave ultimatums and when he was weak he simply ambushed his victims. He massacred countless people and bragged that he had become victorious through terror. There is nothing peaceful in Islam.
    There are no extremists in Islam. Yes, you read it correctly. Islam is the only religion that has no extremists. There are two classes of Muslims: the ‘real’ Muslims and the ‘wishy-washy’ Muslims. The real Muslims are the ones who follow the Quran and the examples of Muhammad. They become terrorists. They are not ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists’. They are ‘good’ Muslims who take their faith seriously. The wishy-washy Muslims are weak in their knowledge and in their faith. They are not ‘moderate’ Muslims, but as the real Muslims call them, they are “hypocrite”. They often know what Islam requires from them, but they are too blasé, too apathetic, too unenthusiastic to be real Muslims, go to Jihad, sacrifice their life and comfort and become martyr in the way of Allah.
    Classifying Muslims as moderate and immoderate is offensive to Muslims. Speaking at Kanal D TV’s Arena program, Turkey’s PM Erdogan commented on the term “moderate Islam” often used in the West and said, “These descriptions are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it.” [Milliyet, Turkey, August 21, 2007]
    Religious tolerance and fighting Islamofascism are not mutually exclusive. Islam, although pretends to be a religion – is eschatological, talks about God and the afterlife – its goal is purely political. The objective of Islam is to establish world domination. This is the same objective of communism and Nazism – very this worldly. As long as Islam cannot be separated from its political goal, it should be classified as a political movement. It is a political movement that is intolerant of all religions. Therefore, to protect freedom of belief and tolerance it is imperative to eliminate intolerant doctrines.
    All humans are born free and must live freely. Despite that we build prisons and deny that freedom to some individuals. This is not a contradiction. Those who violate the freedom of others should not be left free. Tolerance of intolerance breeds intolerance.
    If this applies to individuals, why it should not apply to ideologies? People must be free to believe in what they want, but they are not free to take someone else’s freedom. If a religion is intolerant of other faiths that religion should not be tolerated.

    • Ashfaque Ahmed said

      I think u should read your bhagvad gita better for knowing about islam. i dont know why u people r so scared of islam.if islam would not be the peace religion,it had been the fastest spreading religion worldwide.Do u know that after 9/11, people in US are converting to islam, becoz of its teaching.even Science accepts the concepts of islam ,but there is no no evidence of even one percent of your religion. so it is better u should consult a better physician bcoz u r suffring rom islam phobia..i m giving u a open invatation for conversion to islam..i m sure all ur doubts will fled away.

      Allah Hafiz.

      • Before entering into debate you should know the counterpart well in advance.

        Go through meticulously.

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 1

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 2

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 3

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 4

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 5

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 6

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 7

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 8

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 9

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 10

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 11

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 12

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 13

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 14

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 15

        Islam vs Vedantic debate part 16

        After understanding all these you should go our page AGNIVEER above or contact at agniveer@agniveer.com or agniveer@gmail.com

      • for Ashfaque Ahmed above.

        This also may help you to know the reality.

        Quran and Vedas – 1

        Quran and Vedas – 2

        Quran and Vedas – 3

        Quran and Vedas – 4

        Quran and Vedas – 5

        Quran and Vedas – 6

      • for Ashfaque Ahmed above.

        You must know that after9/11 some 13 thousand people have been converted or embraced (whatever may be) into/to Islam in US as per their Interior Ministry report. Most of the people run to Islam to get financial support from the Muslim Community and want to enjoy Islamic marriage facilities (perverted sex-life) through Shariah.

        But in this span some 2.5 lac people embraced/reconverted Hindu/Arya fold globally by Arya Samaj, ISKCON, Chinmoy Mission, Swami Dayananda, Bharat Sevashram Sangha, Ramkrishna Mission and other Hindu Organisation out of which 30% done in particularly USA.

        Converted Hindus – Christians…. Coming to true religion of peace.

        In India people are also coming back to Hindu fold. Get rid off your illusion and embrace the real truth.

        Zakir Naik’s ‘converted Muslim’ embraces Vedic Hindu Religion through holy inspiration of Agniveer.

        1200 embrace Vedic Hindu Dharma at Shahjahanpur on 23/12/2011

        2000 embrace Vedic Hindu Dharma at Aligarh on 25/12/2011

        YOU ARE TOTALLY FALIURE THE QUANTUM OF SPREADING HINDU DHARMA. WE ARE GROWING AGAIN FROM 2011RAPIDLY. SATYA SANATAN VAIDIC DHARMA KI JAI. HINDU DHARMA KI JAI. BHARAT MATA KI JAI.

      • acdd said

        asfhaqw ahmed
        which idiot told you that hinduism have no evidence of science
        read this
        http://www.hinduwisdom.info
        if westereners are converting to islam then several muslims are leaving islamic cult in europe .
        there are prominent ex-muslims such as Ali Sina , Wafa Sultan , Nonie Darwish , Ehsan Jami , Mina Ahadi , Mariam Namazie

        so better you should stop learning from madarsah

      • skd said

        Mr. Ashfaq…r u crazy…..HINDUISM don’t have evidence of science!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Rather hinduism can be told is the only religion which talks about science:

        1.It talks about nature worship-The only truly existing GOD which can be seen through open eye………rather than believing just on a fictitious character.

        2.The principle books of Hinduism are The great Vedas-the word itself means Wisdom….it’s all about science

        3.the root of Hindu belief is conscience.rather where science some times assumed to be bound within,which some times is called natural science……….there Vedas give a logical transcendental view……….so it’s not merely about natural science,rather extensively related with Art,Aesthetics and all the goodness of nature……….and ultimately what it teaches;
        To realize everything with it’s true nature and open mentality…….that’s why Hindus are so much liberal that it has always provided a shelter to the threatened,even when they are the most confronting.

        4.Even if we talk about pure science subjects,Vedas are consisted of hymns,which talks about Astronomy,Physics,Chemistry(Atharva Veda),Medical science,known as Ayurveda(Atharva Veda),and base of all science subjects………………MATHEMATICS………………….Do u at all aware that there is a separate branch of mathematics,that is known as……………………………………VEDIC GANITH (Vedic Mathematics)…………that was encoded in the hymns of Veda and was decoded by prominent mathematician and Jagat Guru Shri Varati tirtha krishnaji Maharaj(to say the pope of Hindus)…………(mind the designation i’m not commenting further,however).That is creating a new horizon in the field of mathematics.It’s widely taught in management courses(so if u ever study management,remind that u been taught lessons of KAFERs………..will u study it still?…better turn this idea down).

        I can say many things……….but ‘THE PAGE IS NOT ENOUGH’…………so better u know the truth first..then come on a debate
        If u r not satisfied tell me…there are lot more

        Wishing u’r best realization friend

      • manoj kumar shinghariya said

        श्रीमान अगर यह लेख आप हिंदी मे अनुवाद कर देते तो आपकी बड़ी कृपा होती

  4. Ram Kumar Ohri said

    In connection of “THE FINAL FALL OF ISLAM”.

    Absolutely true, I agree. But first and foremost, it is important to
    re-orient the Hindu mind towards what Krishna preached at Kurukshetra
    – victory through valour while doing one’s duty selflessly.

    Ram Ohri.

  5. Suneel Kotte said

    Dear Sir,

    Thanks for sharing a good article. I have read atleast of 2 persons in history who terrorized Muslims at their own game:
    1)Hulagu Khan
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Baghdad_%281258%29
    2)Hari Singh Nalwa
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hari_Singh_Nalwa

    Youth has to be educated/ awareness has to grow.

    There is some think tank in US which has come up with some strategy and scenarios on best way to strike at the heart of Islam… by bombing mecca repeatedly

    http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/11/01/127598/tancredo-bomb-mecca/?mobile=nc

    Thanks

    Suneel Kotte.

  6. J. N. Azeem. said

    If u don’t Believe in Islam Y do Ur ancestors and U all bow Ur heads in front of The Great Sufi saints Read the true history my dear brothers and sisters. We all r human being. ‘Don’t blame either kill any Innocent’ as said by every religion and their holy book …”May Almighty give all of us the scene to better to thing and better to do”. And May A mighty show Us the path of success.

    J N Azeem.(JN_azeem@yahoo.com).
    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.

    • skd said

      Azeem, i’ve particularly no hatred towads muslims,but i want to bring some facts in your view:

      Sufism itself has evolved taking inspiration from Hinduism,its a historical proven fact.Sufism is merely a Islamic version of Hindu ideology,that enlightened some of muslims,who really were devoted. okay answer some of my simple questions:

      1.If islam is really so much peaceful and tolerant religion,why they invade other cultures as well as convert them into islam!do you want to prove that only u people in the world goes the right way,and each of other cultures(even most celebrated ones)thinks the worst things?

      2.Why most of the cultures feel insecure to deal with Islam?

      3.Why most of the terrorist activities are performed by the muslims?

      4.Why in our country(as well as in other countries)muslims rulers has repeatedly attacked Hindu artistic and architectural establishments,ruined and ground them?

      5.Why after almost a millennium of regime,still muslims sustain a plea of ‘Two nation theory’ and get divided and form another country?Is it only because all indians were not get convert into islam?

      6.Why it is more important for muslims to protest against the insult of the khalifa of Turkey(that is thousands of miles away from India,and to say no thread of mutual interest) through ‘Khilafat upsurge’ than to strengthen ‘Non co-operation movement’,that was directly related to national interest?Is’nt it because the earlier falls under category of Pan-Islamic interest,and the former does’nt.

      7.Partition and formation of another nation was the idea of muslim intellectuals,and they got it just through some dealings with Britishers,without any bloodshed or struggle.on their hand who really fought for the country staking their lives they ultimately got a broken country.CAN U DENY IT ANYWAY?still Pakistanis(once INDIAN MUSLIMS)blame India for the massacre of the partition.WHY?

      8.How Jihad can be justified,which orders to usurp and later kill people as the words of Allah/prophet?

      Sir,actually there are so many things and facts to prove the reality,its upon you to choose the reality or not.
      I don’t know what u r thinking about me at this moment,but u know i personally hardly ever can think of doing wrong with any muslim even after knowing the facts.what i’m telling that you just realize the truth.Its not about arguments and counter-arguments.no need to succumb against anyone but know the truth.

    • arun kumar said

      Azeem Ji, The slaves don’t have choices and once it is started the future generation hs to follow the tradition of their ancestors. That is one reason people are going to Dargaah and mazaar and bow their. Sufi saints were the few in whom general suppressed public saw some hope of goodness, and hence they started giving them respect. Thank you!

  7. bharat said

    The biggest religion is the religion of humanity and that can be available from the Arya and the Veda Concept. It is the Sanatani thread of Humanity without any hesitation. It can only be practiced through education,awareness and action, everything else we ‘say’ or ‘do’ will be a waste of time. We should give importance for the programs that could preach the religious tolerance for those intolerant people who want to break the peace o our society out of intolerance. The beginning has to be from our own self and we should strongly oppose any community or sect trying to influence people minds for their own political or personal benefits or the semetic concepts intolerant to others . Let us work towards the better future of our country and all our families and loved ones. Vande Mataram !!

  8. अरब की प्राचीन समृद्ध वैदिक संस्कृति और भारत

    अरब की प्राचीन समृद्ध वैदिक संस्कृति और भारत अरब देश का भारत, भृगु के पुत्र शुक्राचार्य तथा उनके पोत्र और्व से ऐतिहासिक संबंध प्रमाणित है, यहाँ तक कि “हिस्ट्री ऑफ पर्शिया” के लेखक साइक्स का मत है कि अरब का नाम और्व के ही नाम पर पड़ा, जो विकृत होकर “अरब” हो गया। भारत के उत्तर-पश्चिम में इलावर्त था, जहाँ दैत्य और दानव बसते थे, इस इलावर्त में एशियाई रूस का दक्षिणी-पश्चिमी भाग, ईरान का पूर्वी भाग तथा गिलगित का निकटवर्ती क्षेत्र सम्मिलित था। आदित्यों का आवास स्थान-देवलोक भारत के उत्तर-पूर्व में स्थित हिमालयी क्षेत्रों में रहा था। बेबीलोन की प्राचीन गुफाओं में पुरातात्त्विक खोज में जो भित्ति चित्र मिले है, उनमें विष्णु को हिरण्यकशिपु के भाई हिरण्याक्ष से युद्ध करते हुए उत्कीर्ण किया गया है।
    उस युग में अरब एक बड़ा व्यापारिक केन्द्र रहा था, इसी कारण देवों, दानवों और दैत्यों में इलावर्त के विभाजन को लेकर 12 बार युद्ध ‘देवासुर संग्राम’ हुए। देवताओं के राजा इन्द्र ने अपनी पुत्री ज्यन्ती का विवाह शुक्र के साथ इसी विचार से किया था कि शुक्र उनके (देवों के) पक्षधर बन
    जायें, किन्तु शुक्र दैत्यों के ही गुरू बने रहे। यहाँ तक कि जब दैत्यराज बलि ने शुक्राचार्य का कहना न माना, तो वे उसे त्याग कर अपने पौत्र और्व के पास अरब में आ गये और वहाँ 10 वर्ष रहे। साइक्स ने अपने इतिहास ग्रन्थ “हिस्ट्री ऑफ पर्शिया” में लिखा है कि ‘शुक्राचार्य लिव्ड टेन इयर्स इन अरब’। अरब में शुक्राचार्य का इतना मान-सम्मान हुआ कि आज जिसे ‘काबा’ कहते है, वह वस्तुतः ‘काव्य शुक्र’ (शुक्राचार्य) के सम्मान में निर्मित उनके आराध्य भगवान शिव का ही मन्दिर है। कालांतर में ‘काव्य’ नाम विकृत होकर ‘काबा’ प्रचलित हुआ। अरबी भाषा में ‘शुक्र’ का अर्थ ‘बड़ा’ अर्थात ‘जुम्मा’ इसी कारण किया गया और इसी से ‘जुम्मा’ (शुक्रवार) को मुसलमान
    पवित्र दिन मानते है।
    “बृहस्पति देवानां पुरोहित आसीत्, उशना काव्योऽसुराणाम्”-जैमिनिय ब्रा. (01-125)
    अर्थात बृहस्पति देवों के पुरोहित थे और उशना काव्य (शुक्राचार्य) असुरों के। प्राचीन अरबी काव्य संग्रह गंथ ‘सेअरूल-ओकुल’ के 257वें पृष्ठ पर हजरत मोहम्मद से 2300 वर्ष पूर्व एवं ईसा मसीह से 1800 वर्ष पूर्व पैदा हुए लबी-बिन-ए-अरव्तब-बिन-ए-तुरफा ने अपनी सुप्रसिद्ध कविता में भारत भूमि एवं वेदों को जो सम्मान दिया है, वह इस प्रकार है-
    “अया मुबारेकल अरज मुशैये नोंहा मिनार हिंदे।
    व अरादकल्लाह मज्जोनज्जे जिकरतुन।1।
    वह लवज्जलीयतुन ऐनाने सहबी अरवे अतुन जिकरा।
    वहाजेही योनज्जेलुर्ररसूल मिनल हिंदतुन।2।
    यकूलूनल्लाहः या अहलल अरज आलमीन फुल्लहुम।
    फत्तेबेऊ जिकरतुल वेद हुक्कुन मालन योनज्वेलतुन।3।
    वहोबा आलमुस्साम वल यजुरमिनल्लाहे तनजीलन।
    फऐ नोमा या अरवीयो मुत्तवअन योवसीरीयोनजातुन।4।
    जइसनैन हुमारिक अतर नासेहीन का-अ-खुबातुन।
    व असनात अलाऊढ़न व होवा मश-ए-रतुन।5।”
    अर्थात-(1) हे भारत की पुण्यभूमि (मिनार हिंदे) तू धन्य है, क्योंकि ईश्वर ने अपने ज्ञान के लिए तुझको चुना। (2) वह ईश्वर का ज्ञान प्रकाश, जो चार प्रकाश स्तम्भों के सदृश्य सम्पूर्ण जगत् को प्रकाशित करता है, यह भारतवर्ष (हिंद तुन) में ऋषियों द्वारा चार रूप में प्रकट हुआ। (3) और
    परमात्मा समस्त संसार के मनुष्यों को आज्ञा देता है कि वेद, जो मेरे ज्ञान है, इनके अनुसार आचरण करो।(4) वह ज्ञान के भण्डार साम और यजुर है, जो ईश्वर ने प्रदान किये। इसलिए, हे मेरे भाइयों! इनको मानो, क्योंकि ये हमें मोक्ष का मार्ग बताते है।(5) और दो उनमें से रिक्, अतर (ऋग्वेद, अथर्ववेद) जो हमें भ्रातृत्व की शिक्षा देते है, और जो इनकी शरण में आ गया, वह कभी अन्धकार को प्राप्त नहीं होता।
    इस्लाम मजहब के प्रवर्तक मोहम्मद स्वयं भी वैदिक परिवार में हिन्दू के रूप में जन्में थे, और जब उन्होंने अपने हिन्दू परिवार की परम्परा और वंश से संबंध तोड़ने और स्वयं को पैगम्बर घोषित करना निश्चित किया, तब संयुक्त हिन्दू परिवार छिन्न-भिन्न हो गया और काबा में स्थित महाकाय शिवलिंग (संगे अस्वद) के रक्षार्थ हुए युद्ध में पैगम्बर मोहम्मद के चाचा उमर-बिन-
    ए-हश्शाम को भी अपने प्राण गंवाने पड़े। उमर-बिन-ए-हश्शाम का अरब में एवं केन्द्र काबा (मक्का) में इतना अधिक सम्मान होता था कि सम्पूर्ण अरबी समाज, जो कि भगवान शिव के भक्त थे एवं वेदों के उत्सुक गायक तथा हिन्दू देवी-देवताओं के अनन्य उपासक थे, उन्हें अबुल हाकम अर्थात ‘ज्ञान का पिता’ कहते थे। बाद में मोहम्मद के नये सम्प्रदाय ने उन्हें ईष्यावश अबुल जिहाल ‘अज्ञान का पिता’ कहकर उनकी निन्दा की।
    जब मोहम्मद ने मक्का पर आक्रमण किया, उस समय वहाँ बृहस्पति, मंगल, अश्विनी कुमार, गरूड़, नृसिंह की मूर्तियाँ प्रतिष्ठित थी। साथ ही एक मूर्ति वहाँ विश्वविजेता महाराजा बलि की भी थी, और दानी होने की प्रसिद्धि से उसका एक हाथ सोने का बना था। ‘Holul’ के नाम से अभिहित यह
    मूर्ति वहाँ इब्राहम और इस्माइल की मूर्त्तियो के बराबर रखी थी। मोहम्मद ने उन सब मूर्त्तियों को तोड़कर वहाँ बने कुएँ में फेंक दिया, किन्तु तोड़े गये शिवलिंग का एक टुकडा आज भी काबा में सम्मानपूर्वक न केवल प्रतिष्ठित है, वरन् हज करने जाने वाले मुसलमान उस काले (अश्वेत) प्रस्तर खण्ड अर्थात ‘संगे अस्वद’ को आदर मान देते हुए चूमते है।
    प्राचीन अरबों ने सिन्ध को सिन्ध ही कहा तथा भारतवर्ष के अन्य प्रदेशों को हिन्द निश्चित किया। सिन्ध से हिन्द होने की बात बहुत ही अवैज्ञानिक है। इस्लाम मत के प्रवर्तक मोहम्मद के पैदा होने से 2300 वर्ष पूर्व यानि लगभग 1800 ईश्वी पूर्व भी अरब में हिंद एवं हिंदू शब्द का व्यवहार ज्यों का त्यों आज ही के अर्थ में प्रयुक्त होता था।
    अरब की प्राचीन समृद्ध संस्कृति वैदिक थी तथा उस समय ज्ञान-विज्ञान, कला-कौशल, धर्म-संस्कृति आदि में भारत (हिंद) के साथ उसके प्रगाढ़ संबंध थे। हिंद नाम अरबों को इतना प्यारा लगा कि उन्होंने उस देश के नाम पर अपनी स्त्रियों एवं बच्चों के नाम भी हिंद पर रखे।
    अरबी काव्य संग्रह ग्रंथ ‘ सेअरूल-ओकुल’ के 253वें पृष्ठ पर हजरत मोहम्मद के चाचा उमर-बिन-ए-हश्शाम की कविता है जिसमें उन्होंने हिन्दे यौमन एवं गबुल हिन्दू का प्रयोग बड़े आदर से किया है । ‘उमर-बिन-ए-हश्शाम’ की कविता नयी दिल्ली स्थित मन्दिर मार्ग पर श्री लक्ष्मीनारायण मन्दिर (बिड़ला मन्दिर) की वाटिका में यज्ञशाला के लाल पत्थर के स्तम्भ (खम्बे) पर काली स्याही से लिखी हुई है, जो इस प्रकार है –
    ” कफविनक जिकरा मिन उलुमिन तब असेक ।
    कलुवन अमातातुल हवा व तजक्करू ।1।
    न तज खेरोहा उड़न एललवदए लिलवरा ।
    वलुकएने जातल्लाहे औम असेरू ।2।
    व अहालोलहा अजहू अरानीमन महादेव ओ ।
    मनोजेल इलमुद्दीन मीनहुम व सयत्तरू ।3।
    व सहबी वे याम फीम कामिल हिन्दे यौमन ।
    व यकुलून न लातहजन फइन्नक तवज्जरू ।4।
    मअस्सयरे अरव्लाकन हसनन कुल्लहूम ।
    नजुमुन अजा अत सुम्मा गबुल हिन्दू ।5।
    अर्थात् –

    (1) वह मनुष्य, जिसने सारा जीवन पाप व अधर्म में बिताया हो, काम, क्रोध में अपने यौवन को नष्ट किया हो।

    (2) अदि अन्त में उसको पश्चाताप हो और भलाई की ओर लौटना चाहे, तो क्या उसका कल्याण हो सकता है ?

    (3) एक बार भी सच्चे हृदय से वह महादेव जी की पूजा करे, तो धर्म-मार्ग में उच्च से उच्च पद को पा सकता है।

    (4) हे प्रभु ! मेरा समस्त जीवन लेकर केवल एक दिन भारत (हिंद) के निवास का दे दो, क्योंकि वहाँ पहुँचकर मनुष्य जीवन-मुक्त हो जाता है।

    (5) वहाँ की यात्रा से सारे शुभ कर्मो की प्राप्ति होती है, और आदर्श गुरूजनों (गबुल हिन्दू) का सत्संग मिलता है ।

  9. आमिर खान और टीवी वाले यह भूल गए कि….. भारतीय हिन्दू समाज में नारी को देवी को दर्जा दिया जाता है…… और “”कन्या भ्रूण हत्या”” की शुरुआत कोई दहेज़ के कारण नहीं बल्कि … मुस्लिमों (मुग़ल शासकों) से अपनी बेटियों की इज्जत की रक्षा करना था…….जो हिन्दू लड़कियों के जवान होते ही जबरन उन्हें अपनी हरम में ले जाते थे…!

    इसीलिए….. टीवी वालों को यह भी बताना चाहिए कि….. हिन्दुओं में “”कन्या भ्रूण हत्या”” के असल जिम्मेदार मुस्लिम हैं… ना कि कोई दहेज़प्रथा…!

    खैर….. अगर इतिहास की बात को ना कुरेदा जाए… फिर भी इस बात से किसी को असहमति नहीं होगी कि…… महिलाओं की जितनी बुरी स्थिति “”इस्लाम”” में है … उतनी दुनिया के और किसी भी धर्म या संप्रदाय में नहीं है….!

    1. इस्लाम में…. लड़कियों का बचपन से यौन शोषण किया जाता है… और, उनके रक्षक जैसे कि….. उनके बाप.. भाई.. चाचा… मौसा… फूफा वगैरह ही उस बच्ची को निपटा देते हैं…!

    2. पढाई के उम्र में उन्हें ”शिक्षा” का अधिकार ही नहीं है…. (शरियत के अनुसार).

    3. उनकी शादी कम उम्र में ही कर दी जाती है…. और सूअरों की तरह … 20 -25 … बच्चे पैदा करने को विवश किया जाता है…!

    4. इस्लाम में महिलाओं को…. मस्जिद तक जाने की इजाजत नहीं है….!

    5. इस्लाम में मर्द एक साथ 3 -4 बीबियाँ रख सकता है….!

    6. इस्लाम में किसी भी औरत को महज तीन बार तलाक-तलाक बोल कर तलाक दिया जा सकता है….!

    7. इस्लाम में… तलाक देने के बाद औरत को किसी भी प्रकार का “”गुजारा भत्ता”” देने का कोई प्रावधान नहीं है…!

    8. इस्लाम में औरतों के लिए जन्नत में कोई जगह नहीं …!

    तो भाई (भाई काहे का… सौतेला ही समझ लो) ) आमिर खान……. या तो आपलोग मुस्लिमों को भारतीय समाज का हिस्सा ही नहीं मानते हो….!

    या फिर….. आप लोगों को इस्लाम में महिलाओं की स्थिति काफी सुदृढ़ दिखाई देती है… शायद इसीलिए ….. आपलोगों को इस्लाम की बुराई दिखाने में चरर्र…. से फट जाती है …!

    अगर समाज से गन्दगी दूर करनी ही है तो….. सबसे पहले समाज के गटर यानी कि “”मुस्लिम समाज”” को साफ करो….. हिन्दू समाज कुछ सेकुलरों की वजह से चाहे कितना भी अपभ्रंश क्यों ना हो गया हो….. आज भी इस्लाम से “”लाखों गुना बेहतर”” है … जहाँ माँ..बहन और बेटियों के रिश्ते को आज भी पवित्र माना जाता है…!

    जिस तरह …. हाथी का बच्चा ….. चाहे कितना भी छोटा क्यों ना पैदा हो…. कुत्ते-बिल्लियों से हमेशा बड़ा ही होता है… ..

    उसी प्रकार… हिन्दू धर्म चाहे कितना भी विकृत क्यों ना हो जाये…. इस्लाम-फिस्लाम से लाखों गुना बेहतर ही रहेगा…!

    जय महाकाल…!!!

  10. walter said

    i say throw a pig’s head in their mosques. If they don’t want to assimilate, send them to saudi!

  11. तो ये है इस्लाम के रसूले पाक की नापाक सच्चाई…….
    मुस्लिम विद्वानोँ द्वारा लिखा गया सार्वभौमिक सत्य……..
    पहला सन्दर्भ प्रख्यात मुस्लिम धर्मज्ञ सुन-अबु-दाऊद जी द्वारा लिखित ‘किताब 40-पाक हदीस 4731′ से…..
    इस्लाम के संस्थापक पैगम्बर हजरत मुहम्मद बहुत ही कुरुप,अभद्र,हवसी,विलासी व्यक्ति थे,जो हमेशा औरतोँ के साथ व्यभिचार करने को उन्मुक्त रहते थे लेकिन उनके अति स्थूल बेजान पौरुषहीन आकर्षण विहीन शरीर तथा अतिकुरुप चेहरे के कारण हर औरत उनसे घृणा करती थी।इसी कारण से कोई युवती या सुन्दर स्त्री उनसे विवाह करने को तैयार नहीँ हुई अन्तत: उन्हेँ अपने से दोगुनी उम्र की कुरुप विधवा से विवाह करना पड़ा।
    इसी कारण पैगम्बर ने पूरे इस्लाम धर्म मेँ स्त्रियोँ पर जम आक्रोश निकाला।
    पैगम्बर ने कहा स्त्रियाँ भोग्या होती हैँ वो मर्दोँ के लिये विलास की वस्तु है, ये घृणा की पात्र हैँ,औरते बहुत ही निक्रिष्ट मखलूफ तवायफ मिजाज होती हैँ अल्लाह ताला ने इन्हेँ केवल ईबादतगारोँ के मनोरंजन के लिये भेजा है
    (सन्दर्भ हेतु देखे इब्नेअब्बास : जिल्द 7 किताब 162 हदीस 124 पृष्ठ पर)
    एक दुसरे विद्वान सईल-उल-खुदरी का कहना है कि रसूल ने कहा है सारी औरते एक बार नहीँ बार बार बार मतलब तीन बार लगातार जहन्नुम में भेजने योग्य होती हैँ तथा औरते जहन्नुम का ईंधन होती हैँ। सन्दर्भ हेतु देखे (‘किताब 3 हदीस 826 और सुन मसाई: जिल्द 2 हदीस 1578 पेज 342′
    तथा बुखारी:जिल्द124मुस्लिम किताब 36 हदीस 596 पेज पर)

    जय श्रीराम॥
    जय श्रीकृष्ण॥

    • shadab ahmad said

      apni jawan ko lagam do nahi to tumhari…………kar di jayegi

      shadab ahmad
      amughalshadab@yahoo.com
      49.202.53.229

      Geolocation Information

      Country: India
      State/Region: Maharashtra
      City: Mumbai
      Latitude: 18.975
      Longitude: 72.8258

      • C S Raja said

        oye suar ka aulad shadab… tere muh men pisab karta hun…. ghar ka pata do….. dekhta hun tuje kon banchaega……..

  12. aaj mein jiyo said

    Hey all the writers n readers,

    Its quite clear that the page has no concern with any religions as mentioned.
    Its all about your COUNTRY and my COUNTRY..

    Often i thought how did Britishers invaded and ruled india for more than 300 years.
    Now everybody knows that they have a policy of DIVIDE AND RULE. Very successful and superhit in india.

    I am wondering “how did they left india?”.
    The way we are, they could have ruled 200 years more.

    Please STOP INVITING THEM AGAIN.

  13. premjidas said

    british and pakis all the same.untrustworthy pakis and great bapu got rid of them and pakis wanted their own state,pakiland.trust a muslim????????????i dont

  14. [...] Islam in India. [...]

  15. tdchandna said

    THIS IS THE TIME FOR HINDUS TO RISE- GOOD DAYS HAVE COME–WE SHOULD WORK FOR CONVERSION OF NONHINDUS TO HINDUISM-BY SHUDHI OR OTHER PEACEFUL MEANS-NOW PEOPLE HAVE UNDERSTOOD THE REALITY OF OTHER RELIGIONS -RECENTLY MANY MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN SCHOLERS HAVE EMBRACED HINDU DHARAM-LATEST AMONGS THEM ARE ADVOCATE KHALIL-ULLA OF MADHYA PRADESH -NEW NAME KRISHAN KANT AND MAJID KHAN OF TRINIDAD NEW NAME DHARAM DAS AND EHSAN JMI OF NETHERLAND–THEY HAVE GIVEN VALID REASONS FOR LEAVING ISLAM AND JOINING HINDUISM-I AM GLAD HINDU ORGANIZATIONS ARE DOING GOOD JOB IN THIS DIRECTION-THEY SHOULD STEP UP THEIR EFFORTS-IT IS WRONG TO SAY THAT CASTEISM OR JATIVAD IS AN OBSTACLE IN THE UNITY OF HINDUS–AS YOU SEE THERE IS FIGHTING AND BLOODSHED AMONGST SHIAS AND SUNNIES, AHMEDIAS AND WAHABIES-EVERY WHERE THEY HAVE SEPARATE MOSQUES AND BURIALS FOR EACH COMMUNITY- WHEREAS THERE IS NO SUCH DISTINCTION CASTE-WISE AMONGST HINDUS- NOW HINDUS HAVE ARISEN- THEY HAVE TO KNOW AND FOLLOW SAVARKERVAD–THAT IS TO HINDUISE POLITICS AND MILITARISE HINDUDOM-WE CAN KNOW ABOUT HINDU RASHTRAVAD/ SAVARKERVAD BY GOING THROUGH TWO BOOKS WRITTEN BY VEER SAVARKER- THESE BOOKS ARE–HINDUTV AND HINDU RASHTRA DARSHAN—-T.D.CHANDNA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,084 other followers

%d bloggers like this: