Please forward the YouTube links to all your followers! Every Hindu must watch and understand about the Islam!! Muslims in…
Struggle for Hindu Existence
*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within this lifetime *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.
Calcutta High Court legalized marriage of minor Hindu girls by Muslims. Shame to the civil society. Anti Hindu Force in Hon’ble Calcutta High Court ??
Saturday, January 16, 2010 || Courtesy : http://www.hindusamhati.org
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT AGAIN TAKES ANTI HINDU STAND TO PROMOTE ISLAMOFASCIST ACTIVITIES.
Inexplicable are Calcutta High Court’s verdicts.
Again a minor Hindu girl and a Muslim boy of 22 years eloped. When the case has been moved in the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court comprising Hon’ble Justice Pinaki Ghosh and Justice Prasenjit Mandal, they told, according to media report, that they are not worried about the age of the girl, because the marriage was held under Muslim Law. Its proof also has been produced in the court. Hence they are satisfied. The Hon’ble Judges ordered to present the boy and the girl to the court. The Judges only want to see how they are, and they want to hear from the girl about her mental condition.
Here the boy is Seikh Aajit Ali, 22, and the girl is Moumita Chakraborty. Both are resident of two neighboring villages under Daspur P.S. of West Midnapur district. According to Idrish Ali, advocate of Aajit Ali, the age of the girl is 19. But according to the parents of the girl, their daughter is minor in age. [Ref. – Anandabazar Patrika (p.-4), 16.01.2010]
The advocate will try to save his client, here Seikh Aajit Ali, it is understandable. But strange is the stance of the Hon’ble Judges. They are satisfied that the marriage has been solemnized under Muslim Marriage Act. Hence, age of the girl is no bar.
Funny. How a Hindu girl can marry under Muslim Act? Has she has been converted to Islam? If she has been converted to Islam, how can she do this without proper consent of her legal guardian if she is a minor? In the case of her conversion to Islam before marriage, those who have converted her has committed a culpable offence by converting a minor without the consent of her parents. Why didn’t the Honorable court take cognizance of this offence? If there is no bar for converting a minor boy or girl, then a boy of 9 years or a girl of 8 years can easily be duped and converted by unscrupulous elements. Does our Constitution permit this? We are no legal experts. But, two recent verdicts of Calcutta High Court (the other was delivered on 16.12.10 in the case of Sahidul) will destroy the Hindu Society throughout India.
If these verdicts are within the ambit of our Constitution, then this Constitution is dangerously anti-Hindu. Then we should have no respect for this Constitution. Then we, the Hindus need a separate Hindu Law for us and to protect ourselves. And if the Hon’ble Judges exceeded the limit of the Constitution, then it will be suspected that they are playing in the hands of anti Hindu forces, may be Jehadi forces. After the Justice Dinakaran case and several other cases of impropriety on behalf of some Judges, the Judges are no longer holy cows, they are not above scrutiny.
All the well wishers of Hindu Society should take a serious note of these anti Hindu verdicts of Calcutta High Court.
Thursday, December 17, 2009 || Courtesy : http://www.hindusamhati.org
Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, Thou too?
Anita can’t be disowned, She is our Daughter
Anita can’t be disowned, She is our Daughter and shall ever be
Where are we heading to? This sentence at the very outset may astound you a good deal. Well, before going to any further, let’s check out some readily available facts.
Ever since Islam stepped into the realm of Bengal, forceful conversion of Hindus has been one of the most preferred ploys of the Muslim zealots to make the whole community kowtow. Throughout the Muslim hegemony and 19th century, it was in full swing and gained new momentum with the onset of the 20th century backed by several doctrines. It has been unabated in both erstwhile East Pakistan and contemporary Bangladesh but the same malicious campaign is being witnessed in the Indian state of Bengal too, thanks to the tacit understanding between the pseudo-secular sections and Islamic fundamentalist forces and certainly the uncanny silence of the culpable democratic society.
What is more striking, even the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court, considered as the highest form of judiciary in the state, is corroborating the same spiteful intents. What else can be said if we look at the strange development of the case of Ms Anita Ray?
Ms Anita Ray (aged 15) and Shahidul got married only after she was misled by him. Anita, at the behest of Shahidul, ran from her paternal residence, got converted into Islam and married the venomous guy.
Mr. Suvendu Ray (Anita’s father) got infuriated and with the help of police got hold of the estranged daughter only on 20th October, six days after the couple ran away.
From that period Shahidul was absconding and even though he appealed to the lower court for bail in advance, it was rejected altogether. Strangely enough, yesterday Calcutta High Court has sanctioned the same citing that marriage of women under 15 years is lawful under the Muslim Marriage Act, unlike Hindus. [ Ref : Ananda Bazar Patrika, (page – 7)17.12.09]
What does this lead to? Does the court wish for to affirm that any such act is glorious? Does it want to convey the message that Muslim society is omnipotent and what it does is just? Before that, Anita, at the time of conversion, was of 15 years old only. How can a minor be converted?
It’s definite that the Ray family didn’t consent or respond favorably to the proposal, not to speak of Anita, a minor girl who can’t decide on any such crucial issue, in accordance with Indian Penal Code. What shall the High Court say on this? Is it not illegal to convert a minor as per Indian Constitution?
What can you say then? This is one of the gravest conspiracies known hitherto and must be trounced, forget about remaining indoors and continue to doggone or wish harm upon Shahidul. Without a shred of doubt, he has been backed by the considerable section of Muslims in close proximity, may be there is the involvement of Calcutta section as well.
The line of battlefield has been drawn already and we are taking all types of measures to make the heinous conspiracy bite the dust. Be it legal or……………..
posted by : Tanusree Pathak
10 comments on “Calcutta High Court legalized marriage of minor Hindu girls by Muslims. Shame to the civil society. Anti Hindu Force in Hon’ble Calcutta High Court ??”
Leave a comment
Your message has been sent
All Hindus should unite to protect Ashim Sarkar
The atrocities on non Muslims in Bangladesh will never stop till a single Hindu will exist there . The only…
[…] Circumcision Jihad: Andhra Govt to Probe Alleged Circumcision Racket to Victimize Hindus! […]
Congratulations to the families for coming back to Sanatan Dharma. I request all Hindus to treat their fellow Hindus with…
Struggle for Hindu Existence 
These people find every means to infiltrate a pure society… they had done it in the past and are still trying their best to achieve their motives. I listened to a speaker once and he was saying that the whole motive of their religion is to convert the world. Hence making all people Muslims… I so wish them luck… These acts such as this will not get them anyway.
Jai Shri Krishn – May peace and happiness be bestowed on all!!!
Aditya Persaud
Projects/Research Officer,
Agriculture Division,
Regent & Vlissengen Roads,
Bourda, Georgetown, Guyana.
LikeLike
To,
Hindu Existence.
The recent verdicts of Calcutta High Court will encourage the Muslim fanatics to grab Hindu minor girls for conversion into Islam forcefully or trick-fully for their ultimate goal to marry and enjoy Hindu Girls. Calcutta High Court did not pronounce any justified thing for a civil society. It will endanger the Hindu Society to a Great Extent. The respective judges are enemies of Hindu Society and we may not ignore the play of Islamic Oil Fund ( Petro-dollars) to influence the situation in favour of the Fundamental Islamic Power of Bengal through a design drawn by Idrish Ali, Twaha Siddique and Imam Barkati.
Why don’t you go to the Supreme Court? I will help you with finance as per my capability.
But, we should boycott these anti-hindu judges of Calcutta High Court immediately.
With regards,
SARATHI BASU.
LikeLike
Insight: http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=328&page=29
Judicial imposition of Muslim Law on a Hindu girl
By V Sundaram, IAS (Retd)
WHEN two or three years ago, the Supreme Court of India passed what I considered to be a patently illegal and unconstitutional order in a specific case, I wrote an article in these columns under the title: ‘The darkest day in India’s Legal History’.
I am constrained to use the same words again in respect of a blatantly and patently illegal order recently passed by the Calcutta High Court. It is a matter of national shame for all the Hindu women of India that the Calcutta High Court on December 17, 2009 granted the anticipatory bail plea of a 26-year-old youth from Murshidabad who had been accused of kidnapping and marrying a 15-year-old Hindu minor girl.
One Sairul Sheikh, a resident of Bakultala in Behrampore, has been accused of kidnapping and forcibly marrying a Hindu minor girl called Anita Roy. Anita’s mother Jyotsna had lodged a complaint with Behrampore Police Station that her daughter had been missing since October 14. On October 15, she came to know that Sairul Sheikh had ‘kidnapped and married’ her minor daughter.
A Division Bench of the Calcutta High court consisting of Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghosh and Justice S P Talukdar allowed Sheikh’s plea after his lawyers submitted that the marriage was legal under Muslim Personal Law. Holding the marriage to be legal, the Calcutta High Court Bench granted Sheikh’s anticipatory bail application.
Even if Sairul Sheikh had married a minor Muslim girl then he would have been entitled to the full benefit of Muslim Personal Law. But he has no right to impose that Islamic law upon the Hindu men and women of India in general and Hindu minor girls in particular. He cannot claim kidnapping of a Hindu minor girl or rape of a Hindu minor girl as a legitimate ‘minority right’ under the Indian Constitution!!
The Calcutta High Court has given a new and twisted illegal interpretation to Muslim Personal Law. By denying legitimate legal relief to the Hindu minor girl Anita and her mother Jyotsna under The Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 (Courtesy: Website of Ministry of Women and Child Development, GOI http://wcd.nic.in/cmr1929.htm), the Calcutta High Court has made the Hindus of India stateless non-persons similar to the status of non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia.
I fervently hope that many Hindu organisations in India would file an application to the Chief Justice of India for Public Interest Litigation in order to prevent the General Blanjet’s illegal imposition of Muslim Personal Law on the Hindu citizens of India.
The standard legal dictum is that no citizen can legally claim ignorance of law as an excuse for violation of laws of the land. What is applicable to an individual is equally applicable to all our courts of Law as well. In this context let me invite the attention of the Calcutta High Court to the following provisions of The Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 (19 of 1929):
Section 2 : Definitions — In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context:
(a) “Child” means a person who, if a male, has not completed twenty one years of age, and if a female, has not completed eighteen years of age ;
Section 4 : Punishment for male adult above twenty one years of age marrying a child — Whoever, being a male above twenty one years of age, contracts a child marriage shall be punishable with simple imprisonment which may extend to three months and shall also be liable to fine.
Sairul Sheikh, the accused in this case as per Muslim Personal Law is patently guilty of blatant violation of Section 4 of the Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929. Any special Islamic privilege he might have under Muslim Personal Law cannot be invoked under this Act when the offence is committed against a Hindu minor girl.
Jagmohan Singh Khurmi, a fearless writer, has written a brilliant essay titled ‘Islamic Lust for Hindu Women: Psychological Warfare’. Let me quote his hilarious and yet sobering words here: “If these silly Bollywood Hindu film-makers think that they are actually building “secular bridges” by portraying a Muslim hero riding a Hindu woman, then they are in error. They fail to understand Islamic mindset. Even if you make all the Muslims in India superstars, in Pakistan this will not be accepted as a sign of Hindu benevolence or even a gesture of genuine ‘Congress secularism’ but as an explicit evidence of Hindu inferiority and Islamic superiority! Such is their contempt for all things Hindu.”
One woman journalist Tavleen Singh, known for her pro-Islamic stand and who at times went so far as to even justify Islamic terrorism, once got inside the Islamic house of the fanatic Dar-ul-Uloom at Deoband and for the first time in her life discovered the real nature of Islam for herself! To her horror she found that it was millions of light-years away from the rosy imagery Khushwant Singh and Romila Thapar had taught her for years. After a few minutes Tavleen Singh came out stamping her feet in fury. She was so angry that she wrote her next article under title: “If this is what secularism means, give me Hindutva.”
Finally, I cannot help quoting the beautifully apt words of Koenraad Elst: “One of the most painful aspects of Muslim demographic warfare is the open attempt by Muslims to grab non-Muslim girls to use them for their own demographic ambitions, meanwhile also inflicting a good dose of humiliation on the accursed kafirs. In Bangladesh and in Muslim-majority areas inside India, this often takes the form of simply kidnapping girls, or of threatening their families to marry them out to Muslims.”
(The writer can be contacted at vsundaram@newstodaynet.com)
LikeLike
A Foolish Judgment by the Calcutta High Court
Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari
Shubhendu Ray, a resident of Bakultala area of Bahrampur in the district of Murshidabad, West Bengal. Mr Ray is a businessman and a local leader of a political party. His daughter Anita is a 15-year-old girl. Shahidul, a local Muslim boy seduced Anita and forcefully abducted her on 14 October, this year. Later on, she was forcefully converted to Islam and on the next day Shahidul married her. On 20 October, Shubhendu Ray, with the help of the police, went to Shahidul’s house and recovered his daughter Anita. A case was moved against Shahidul and then onward he was absconding.
Meanwhile, Shahidul filed an anticipatory bail petition to the court at Barhamour but the petition was rejected. Then Shahidul moved his petition to the Calcutta High Court and a division bench, comprising of Justice Pinaki Ghosh and Justice Shailendra Prasad Talukdar (both of them are Hindus), granted the anticipatory bail to Shahidul, on 16 December. While delivering their verdict, the Judges said that, though marriage of a girl below 18 is unlawful according to Hindu Marriage Act, it is not applicable in the present case. Since Anita was converted to Islam prior to her marriage, the case falls under the purview of the Muslim Marriage Act and as the Muslim Marriage Act permits one to marry a 15 tear-old girl, hence Shahidul has done no offence.
The question therefore arises – Is conversion of a minor girl of 15 is valid in law? If not, then the conversion of minor girl Anita stands null and void in the court of law. So treating her marriage according to Muslim Marriage Act does not arise. Furthermore, eloping with a minor girl of 15 without the consent of her parents is a clear case of kidnapping, which is a highly criminal offence and how the honourable judges have overlooked this crime on the part of Shahidul before granting him the said anticipatory bail. Such carelessness and callousness of the honourable judges of a High Court is unpardonable.
LikeLike
Apne ladkiyoko asal me Muslim aur Christianity kya cheese hai ye shiksha de. Unhe love jihad ke bareme bataye .Suaar ke bachho ki filme na dekhe. Na hi ghar me film chalaye.
PLEASE TEACH THE REALITY OF ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY TO OUR GIRLS. ALERT THEM ABOUT ‘LOVE JIHAD’. DO NOT WATCH THE FILMS MADE BY THE BLOODY SWINES. NOT EVEN PLAY ANY SUCH FILMS IN YOUR HOMES.
UTTAR HINDUSTANI SENA.
LikeLike
Once and for all…….enough is enough…..the only option left is to teach them the way they understands……cut them off and set an example…each time and everytime……no court…..again please.
LikeLike
Such acts of unilateral justice will bring imbalance to the soceity.No comments for love marriage or elopement,but secularism doesnot mean anti-hinduism.Muslim ppl call non-muslims ‘kafer’,but thr is not such word for non-hindus.If peace is sought by such love marriages,muslims should respect hindu religeons as they respect theirs.Otherwise they should abstain frm such crimes.If the judges r biased by such pseudo-secularism,they should b aware that they r not secularists.They can not bring equality,& justice for all by supporting one religeon blindly.God give wisdom to those unscrupulous judges!
LikeLike
Judges are just pawns at the hands of foolish people crying secularism in India!
In India,U can say U r Muslim,U r Christian;buy when U say U r a Hindu,everybody(even most of d literate fools among Hindus also) will think dat U r non-secular.
Shamefully it is a congress led UPA politics to devide & rule.
Lets be equal to all religeons.Hinduism is also a faith as the Muslim religeon is.Atleast judiciary should be higher than party politics or favourism!
LikeLike
It is because of very poor understanding of laws.
Anyway we hindus do not care for our values, only fight when things happen. We are failing to imbibe pride among our children in our culture. They are easily lead to such saitanic verses easily. The judges who have delivered such judgement r not BRAHMAs to know each and everything about law. They interprit based on how strong a lawyer shouts his arguments. \
fault stems from the quality. Quality is not attained through reservations, it comes through merit. When Merit takes back seat, illegalities bound to happen. we can continue to expect skewed judgements .
LikeLike
Shame on Hindu girls……….
LikeLike