[…] How Hindu Rishi Sunak is Big Problem for Some UK Muslims […]
*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.
A Hindustan Times report dated 30 March 2014 recounts a conversation with Kolkata’s Shahi Imam N.R. Barkati. The Shahi Imam in the context of the upcoming general elections had this to say:
You must understand we ruled Hindustan for 1,000 years. But we never made Hindus slaves here, like the British did. We want to live in harmony now… If BJP comes to power, implements the RSS agenda, if they impose uniform civil code, if they stop us from praying, the Muslim clergy and scholars will discuss it and can even proclaim jehad.
Firstly, it is clear that N.R. Barkati’s claim that the “we” in the sentence, “You must understand we ruled Hindustan for 1,000 years” refers to the early-to-late medieval Muslim rule of India. The implication of this statement is clear: Barkati claims communal inheritance over the sovereignty of the modern democratic republic of India based equally, on a communal reading of history.
Secondly, Barkati’s claim that “we” meaning, Muslims “never made Hindus slaves here,” is patently false. One could refer to Prof. K.S. Lal’s scholarly work entitled Muslim Slave System in Medieval India for a comprehensive treatment of the exact nature, scope, and extent of Hindu slave-taking practised by the medieval Sultans and Nawabs in India.
Thirdly, Barkati’s caution of “if the BJP comes to power and implements the RSS agenda… the Muslim clergy and scholars will discuss it and can even proclaim jehad” merits closer examination.
According to A Dictionary of Islam, the word Jihad in simple terms means waging a physical war against non-Muslims in order to either kill or convert them in order to spread Islam throughout the world. It is enjoined upon all Muslims as a holy duty. Jihad has, since the inception of Islam, also been a battle cry. In our own times, the 9/11 attack, the Bali bombings, the London train bombings, and numerous other similar incidents have been Jihads. In other words, they have been wars waged by Muslims against non-Muslims in the same country or against foreign countries.
This is the historical, religious and social context in which to place Barkati’s statement. In other words, Barkati, an Indian citizen, is openly expressing his intent to wage war against India if a certain political party comes to power.
This proclamation by Barkati attracts penal action primarily under IPC sections 121, 121 (A) and 122. All three Sections are reproduced below:
Section 121 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
121. Waging, or attempting to wage war, or abetting waging of war, against the Government of India.– Whoever wages war against the 3[ Government of India], or attempts to wage such war, or abets the waging of such war, shall be punished with death, or 4[ imprisonment for life] 5[ and shall also be liable to fine]. 6[ Illustration.] 7[ A joins an insurrection against the 3[ Government of India]. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
Section 121A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
121A. 1[ Conspiracy to commit offences punishable by section 121.– Whoever within or without 2[ India] conspires to commit any of the offences punishable by section 121, 3[ or conspires to overawe, by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force, 4[ the Central Government or any State Government 5[ ], shall be punished with 6[ imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description which may extend to ten years, 7[ and shall also be liable to fine]. Explanation.- To constitute a conspiracy under this section, it is not necessary that any act or illegal omission shall take place in pursuance thereof.]
Section 122 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
122. Collecting arms, etc., with intention of waging war against the Government of India.– Whoever collects men, arms or ammunition or otherwise prepares to wage war with the intention of either waging or being prepared to wage war against the 8[ Government of India], shall be punished with 9[ imprisonment for life] or imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding ten years, 10[ and shall also be liable to fine].
Further, Barkati’s pronouncements also indirectly attract penalty under the Election Commission’s Model Code of Conduct.
See how N R Barkati challenged the majority people along with the Indian Judiciary in earlier occasion.
(all these Nurur Rehman Barkat, Idrish Ali and others seen in the above video are all the Trinamul leaders and in a very close proximity to Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, most of the people like to call her as Mamtaz Banu).
Given these facts as well as the legal position, it is clear that Shahi Imam Barkati’s proclamation openly violates the law, and is dangerous to the safety and sovereignty of the nation.
Therefore, in light of the aforementioned examination of facts from various perspectives, it is clear that Shahi Imam Barkati can be tried under the law for his statement.
HT Correspondent and PTI | New Delhi | April 04, 2014:: Syed Ahmed Bukhari, Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid in Delhi, on Friday declared his support to the Congress party, saying it will “strengthen” secularism.
He also announced support to Mamata Banerjee’s Trinamool Congress, a past ally of the BJP, in West Bengal and Lalu Prasad’s Rashtriya Janata Dal, a Congress ally, in Bihar.
Considered an influential religious leader, Bukhari termed communalism a “bigger threat” than corruption and appealed to Muslims to support the Congress. He, however, clarified the appeal was not a fatwa. Read details here.
Deepshikha Ghosh | NDTV | New Selhi | April 05, 2014:: One of the country’s most prominent religious Muslim leaders has declared his support for the Congress for the national election which begins on Monday.
Syed Ahmed Bukhari, the Shahi Imam of the Jama Masjid mosque in the capital, said today, “The nation is in danger from communal forces. We should ensure secular votes are not divided.” (Full coverage: India Votes 2014)
A few days ago, Congress president Sonia Gandhi met the Imam and reportedly asked him to ensure the minority vote in India is not split. Yesterday, the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, accused Mrs Gandhi of indulging in “open communalism” by seeking votes on the basis of religion. The party has made the same complaint to the Election Commission. (Read more)
The Imam also said today that Mulayam Singh Yadav’s Samajwadi Party, which governs Uttar Pradesh, and which he had backed in the 2012 state polls, had failed to protect Muslims. He cited September’s riots in Muzaffarnagar in western Uttar Pradesh in which nearly 60 people were killed and nearly 80,000 displaced in Hindu-Muslim violence. Read details here.