Bharat Sarkar dekho Bharatki halet. Bechawo Sanatan Bharatki. Je Desh Dharm hai. Je semachar Sri Hanuman Seva Sevaki.
*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.
Upananda Brahmachari | HENB | Haridwar | Oct 15, 2022:: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Government to file its reply in the plea filed by Rajya sabha MP and BJP leader Subramanian Swamy seeking Ram Setu to be declared as a national heritage monument. The Bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and Hima Kohli directed the Centre to file its reply when Swamy complained that for the past eight years the Government is evading it.
“Union of India has failed to file its affidavit. The matter is pending for eight years. They should file an affidavit and say when will they decide. It has been going on and on. They should file a counter. If they are opposing they have to say so. Otherwise they are supporting, there is no other way,” Swamy told the Court. The bench asked ASG Madhvi Divan to file the reply before the next date of hearing.
Ram Sethu, also known as Adam’s bridge as claimed by Christian missionary lobby, is a chain of limestone shoals between Pamban Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.
Though the Left and Dravida school of historians try to establish the Ram Setu or Adam’s Bridge as natural creation, the eminent geologists in Discovery Science Channel analyzed the satellite pictures of Ram Setu as captured by NASA and claimed it as a man made super-human work referring to the making of a bridge by the banara sena connected to the rescue of Sita by lord Rama from Ravan’s Lanka as told in Ramayana.
Swamy had raised the issue of declaration of Ram Sethu as a national monument in his PIL against the controversial Sethusamudram Ship Channel project. The PIL was initiated before Madras High Court.
The apex court transferred the plea before itself in 2007 and stayed work for the project on the Sethu Samudram project. Subsequently, Center had informed the court that owing to the “socio-economic disadvantages” of the project, it was willing to explore another route to the shipping channel project without damaging the Ram Sethu.
Dr. Swamy in his petition has sought the Top Court to pass an order and direct the Union of India to engage the Geological Survey of India and Archeological Survey of India to conduct a detailed survey with respect to Ram Setu as it is an ancient monument of national importance.
On November 13, 2019, the apex court had granted Center six weeks to clarify its stand on the Ram Sethu. It had also granted Swamy liberty to approach the court if the response of the Center was not filed.
In August, before a bench of Justices Chandrachud and Bopanna, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had submitted before the court that he will take stock of the situation and ascertain whether a counter must be filed as two or three affidavits had already been filed in the matter.
Swamy, however, had told the court that the affidavits had been filed in the disposed of matter pertaining to Sethu Samudram and not the present one.
From the row on Ram Setu in the Supreme court, it is clear that the Central Govt led by PM Modi has been delaying in the instant case and factually putting hindrance for the declaration of Ram Setu as a National Heritage Monument.
But, it is highly interesting that a center right govt in India believed as having Hindu ideology under the leadership of a Hindutva poster boy is not serious enough to declare Ram Setu as a national heritage monument.
As the ‘perpetrated’ Sethusamudram Ship Channel project was stalled on various grounds like ecological dis-balance, source out of Thorium reserve and hurting the Hindu sentiment by destroying a historical evidence connected to Lord Rama and Ramayana; the demand made by Dr Swamy to declare Ram Setu as a National Heritage Monument was definitely a proper and praiseworthy step. But, why Modi Govt in the center is deliberately delaying the case in Supreme Court?
The reasons cannot be ascertained absolutely right, but can be defined in multiple reasons evident from circumstantial evidences as below:
From the beginning it is seen the BJP Masterstroke Men had their aversion to Dr Subramanian Swamy from a fear psychosis as Swamy was never posed as a palatable personality for the perpetrating politicians. So, Swamy was never seen as a Minister in Finance or Law, while he possessed his best caliber for those.
As a free-thinker, positive Hinduist and master of many things, the views of Swamy could not be matched with the Bharatiya Janata Party line as found different issues like financial policies, foreign policies and law matters including Prevention of Cow Slaughter, Places of Worship Act and even in Ramjanmabhoomi matters. Swamy’s Virat Hindu concept could not be corroborated with the BJP’s pseudo Hindutva concept of election politics.
In the contrast of both academic and ideological aspects, Modi-Shah duo developed an animosity with Dr Swamy making an anti-Swamy lobby within the BJP leadership and supporters both.
In such a situation, Ram Setu issue raised by Swamy has been made as another spate of rivalry within BJP.
This point cannot be ignored that the BJP govt has yet to set a strong grip upon the Govt officials in the related Departments in concerned ministries and as a matter of fact some power within the power are favoring the Adam’s Bridge lobby to deter the declaration of Ram Setu as a National Heritage Monument.
More than that, the Chanakyas in BJP may think that declaring Ram Setu as National Heritage Monument will stop their fanciful adventure in Tamil Nadu politics for ever believing in the absurd equation that Lord Rama is still unbearable in the electorate line of the state as vitiated by the DMK all along.
And lastly its amazing to think about a secret deal with any anti-Indian lobby for the revival of the controversial Sethusamudram Ship Channel project once again.
Whatever may be, it is grossly unfortunate the Ram Setu is not declared yet as a National Heritage Monument dishonoring Lord Rama and Ramayana.
But, history will write the right things about the role of Dr Subramanian Swamy and Bharatiya Janata Party on Ram Setu as a National Heritage Monument in India or not.
…
__Inputs from PNS & LawBeat.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Donation For Hindu Existence Forum
Donation for supporting Hindu Existence Forum's research works on Hindutva Strategies, Cultural and Traditional proliferation and Global Peace.
$10.00
Bharat Sarkar dekho Bharatki halet. Bechawo Sanatan Bharatki. Je Desh Dharm hai. Je semachar Sri Hanuman Seva Sevaki.
Why the Govt concerned should ban these kinds of anti-Hindu culture? The Lok Sabha should enact a Law/Act to ban…
Badhai ho Suresh ji apko sujha ke liye. Bahut bahut dhanyabad apko
Phirse Sanatan Bharat benawo. Bharati, jago, utho ank kholo aur dhanowko beghawo. Bharat Devis/Devtaski desh hai. Jo nahi mannenge Bharat…
When archeological evidence is readily available, Hindu temple must be constructed on the site where Hindu temple once stood
ABVP Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha Amit Shah Anti Hindu Mamata Banerjee Awami League Baba Ramdev Bajrang Dal Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Bharat Sevashram Sangha. BJP Calcutta High Court CONGRESS Dr. Subramanian Swamy Dr Pravin Togadia Dr Subramanian Swamy (BJP) Hindu Existence Forum HINDU JANAJAGRUTI SAMITI Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) Hindu Persecution in Bangladesh Hindu Persecution in Pakistan Hindu Samhati ISKCON Love Jihad Mamata Banerjee Mohan Bhagwat Narendra Modi National Investigation Agency (NIA) Pakistan PM Modi Rajnath Singh Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) RSS RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat Sanatan Sanstha Shiv Sena Sri Ram Sena Supreme Court of India Uniform Civil Code Upananda Brahmachari UP CM Yogi Adityanath VHP Vishwa Hindu Parishad Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) WB CM Mamata Banerjee YOGI ADITYANATH
In Sanatan Bharat Ram Setu is an integral part in Bharat Desh. They who
are against it are enemies of Sanatan Bharat. But why? There is no
reason to oppose it. Sanatan Bharat existed before the birth of Christianity
and Islam. These barbaric invaders had tried to wipe out the history of
Hindus and the creation of the Congressy-Nehru constitution and flag, the
politicians of today are supporting this law, while it is against the interest of
the Nation. Barbaric war-losers can not be given the same right as the Victor.
War was needed to bring down the enemies and those who died defending the Native heritage can not be insulted by anti-Hindu politicians. This is the
message of Sri Hanuman Seva Sena.
LikeLike
All the Governments of India have till now refused and also rejected the
natural rights of Sanatan Bharat. Sanatan Bharat has the most civilized
culture and this civilization was since about 400 years ago victim of barbaric foreign invaders, who had tried to destroy this with force. The Heroes of Sanatan Bharat have prevented this happening. This means all what is on and in Sanatan Bharat can not be denied by no force. Sanatan Bharat still exist,
but the enemies of Bharat are trying to deny it. Sanatan Bharat is the land
of Devis/Devtas and can not be destroyed. This is a message of Sri Hanuman
Seva Sena.
LikeLike
Pingback: Why Modi Govt is intentionally delaying the Ram Setu case in Supreme Court?