*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.
Upananda Brahmachari | HENB | Haridwar | Jan 10, 2019:: The most sensible Ayodhya hearing on 10th January was deferred as the senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the Muslim parties in the Supreme Court, mentioned that the designated five judge bench included Justice U U Lalit who acted as an advocate in a related case in 1994+.
Appearance as an advocate in a Babri Masjid demolition contempt case more than 20 years ago against then UP CM Kalyan Singh and others became the reason for Justice Lalit to recuse himself from the five judge bench that forced the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi led bench to defer charting the schedule for Ayodhya matter for arguments to January 29 next+.
So, the game plan of the Congress and the other anti-Hindu forces to defer the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babari matter in SC beyond Loksabha election+ meets its goal and SC has acted like an agent of Congress and anti-Hindu forces so that the demand of speedy hearing and early disposal of the case can not be fulfilled any way. Congress and supporters of Babri mosque have been demanding the posting of the case after 2019 Loksabha election.
Through the formation of five judge bench instead of a declared three judge bench, which was also objected by Senior Counsel Dhavan, CJI Ranjan Gogoi hatched a plan to get objections on it technically so that the case might be disputed and deferred anyway.
The CJI Gogoi constituted his desired bench to hear and dispose the Ayodhya matter by superseding six senior Judges from the Supreme Court Judges seniority list+. CJI (Rank-1) opted Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde (R-3), N.V. Ramana J. (R-4), Uday Umesh Lalit J. (R-9) and D.Y. Chandrachud J. (R-11) clearly superseding Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri (R-2), Arun Mishra J. (R-5), R.F. Nariman J. (R-6), Abhay Manohar Sapre J. (R-7), R. Banumathi J. (R-8) and A.M. Khanwilkar J. (R-10).
The above arbitration by CJI Gogoi is not clueless as he excluded Justice Khanwilkar from the designated Ayodhya Bench for being an advocate in related Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri cases earlier, but opted Justice Lalit who also acted as an advocate in related case. It is not an inadvertence or forgetfulness in the part of CJI Ranjan Gogoi, but he is tactfully doing many mischievous things to damage Ayodhya case as he could not find any importance to slot the case in a early hearing.
From the antecedents and from many doubtful move by CJI on Ayodhya matter, nobody can say the fate of 29th January hearing on Ayodhya matter as fixed in the Supreme Court.
Another set of questions for the logic of formation of five judge bench bench, non-inclusion of any minority member in the bench, the CJI’s own headache on the purity of translation of documents attached in Allahabad High Court’s verdict and many things related may defer Ayodhya case in March next.
While BJP and Sangha Parivar started their political propaganda to blame Congress as anti Ram Mandir and CJI as Congress agent, the common Hindu people in this country are being frustrated with the ugly game on Ram Temple by Political parties and Indian judiciaries.
The Hindu people for Ayodhya Ram Temple are quite aware for the anti-Hindu role of Congress and Judiciary as they are seeing the turn of Sabarimala and Ayodhya one after another; but frustrated majority people are unable too to understand why PM Modi and BJP are not introducing an ordinance on Ram Temple for passing it in a joint parliamentary session.
BJP, RSS, VHP are plying the dirty game on Ram Temple which is well orchestrated by their machinery in Supreme court and Congress is fueling minority sentiments.
The perpetration of Judicial system against Hindu sentiments and demands; acting as a agent of pseudo secular ideology of Congress and most unfortunate turn of BJP as another secular force like Congress to undermine Hindu demands…. all are most dangerous.
Hindus are most law abiding people and have full reverence on Indian Judiciary. But, that can’t be a point of rape of their sentiments.
__inputs from Agencies. Courtey to the links used above.