2 comments on “Indian Lawmaker Yogi Adityanath opens the Truth about Hindu-Muslim Riots, Relation & Reality.”

1. D C Nath, Patriots' Forum

   September 9, 2014

   

   What to do with Pakistan?
   Gautam Adhikari in Just Graffiti | Edit Page, World | TOI

   Original Link: http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/just-graffiti/what-to-do-with-pakistan/

   September 6, 2014, 12:02 AM IST | Washington:: Trouble brews again in the house next door. Loud quarrels, beatings, authorities in khaki asking everyone to behave or else. India watches and shrugs.

   Indians live in a bad neighborhood. Some disaffected neighbours see India as too domineering. But one in particular has been an exasperating thorn in the side for over six decades. Its dispute with India is so fundamental that you have to ask how do you deal with a problem like Pakistan? My resigned view is: You can’t.

   There’s very little democratic India can do to change the situation for the better other than to continue a few ritualistic optics like talking about expanded trade and repeating fruitless meetings between bureaucrats to discuss travel or the border. Which is why the cancellation of a meeting between foreign secretaries of the two countries is of little consequence even if you disagree with the immediate reason cited by New Delhi for the cancellation. Such meetings really aren’t productive.

   That’s because one foreign secretary, India’s, is operating under the direction of the leader of a democratically empowered government. Pakistan’s foreign secretary, with due respect, has to obey a different and unseen master. When it comes to foreign policy, especially when it relates to the US, Saudi Arabia, China and India, it is nominally in the hands of the elected government in Islamabad. The army, and its child the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), call the shots. Thus, only the generals can determine the course of Indo-Pak relations.

   A widespread belief in turmoil-embroiled Pakistan is that the army stoked the current protests to destabilise the government. That’s because, one, it wants General Pervez Musharraf to be free; and, two, it’s unhappy with Nawaz Sharif’s desire to stabilise relations with India. True or not, the status quo in Indo-Pak relations allows the army commanders to warn of an ever-festering existential threat.

   Pakistan is the only nuclear-armed power that actively uses cross-border terrorism on its eastern as well as western borders as an asymmetric weapon to achieve strategic goals. There’s nothing that a democratic government in Islamabad can do about it, other than try to contain the disastrous domestic outcome of such a policy.

   Which brings me to the concern among many here in Washington at the setback they see in India-Pakistan relations because of the failure of foreign secretaries to talk. The two governments must talk to settle disputes, they say, if for nothing at least to ratchet down fears of a nuclear Armageddon.
   Toby Dalton of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, for instance, agrees that diplomats may not be able to achieve much. He writes in The Diplomat magazine that the two prime ministers should get together, perhaps on the sidelines of the coming United Nations meeting, to hammer out the contours of an agreement.

   “Diplomats, however well-meaning though they may be, represent bureaucratic and institutional interests rather than national interest”, he says. Heads of government must meet and reconcile outstanding issues to draw a map for peace.

   Once again, one head of government is not the horse’s head when it comes to deciding foreign policy. Sure, let Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif shoot the breeze in New York. There’s value in optics in a media-soaked age. But analysts in the US must understand that Sharif can’t deliver unless the powers in Rawalpindi say ‘Yes’.

   For the army to agree to a lasting peace with India, two possible levers exist. One is a sea change in Pakistan’s polity in which the generals are pushed back into the barracks or at least taken down several significant notches in the decision-making process which thenceforth can be truly controlled by a democratic government. It’s unlikely, though it has happened in some form in Indonesia and Bangladesh.

   The other potential lever is a combined persuasive power of Washington and Beijing to force the generals’ hands. Again, it’s unlikely. Besides, given their track record, the generals will probably find ways to play one off against the other.

   Read a recent book Magnificent Delusions by Husain Haqqani, a former ambassador of Pakistan to the US, for a gripping and bold account of how Pakistan’s generals stay in power and cunningly manipulate the US to their advantage. You’ll marvel at their duplicity and the gullibility of their benefactors.

   ____________________________

   No matter what Pakistan does or how Pakistan acts to India, India has to keep a close watch on goings–on there. The present political crisis in that country is nothing of unusual nature. It is a clear clash again between civilian government and deep-rooted and very well-entrenched vested interest of the Pak Military.

   The second editorial in “The Times of India” of September 6, by Gautam Adhikari throws up what appeared to be quite a balanced view. The editorial (attached) sums it this way:

   “Read a recent book Magnificent Delusions by Husain Haqqani, a former ambassador of Pakistan to the US, for a gripping and bold account of how Pakistan’s generals stay in power and cunningly manipulate the US to their advantage. You’ll marvel at their duplicity and the gullibility of their benefactors.”

   Friends, there the matter stands for the present with no immediate long-term solution in sight—an uncertainty at India’s door step is always worrisome.

   Vande Mataram.

   Yours Sevak,

   D C Nath, (Former Spl. Director, IB).

   Mobile: +91 9811995693 // Email: dcnath.office@gmail.com

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. C Joy Raj

   September 9, 2014

   

   Hindi Transcription of this Video of Yogi Adityanath.

   देश के अंदर दंगे का जो ट्रेंड देखा गया है पुरे देश के अंदर बह स्पस्ट है । १०-२०% के बीच में जहां मुस्लिम आबादी है बहा पर सांप्रदायिक झारपे जाएदा है । जहां पर २०% से लेके ३५% से ४०% तक मुस्लिम आबादी है बहा सांप्रदायिक भीषऩ दंगे है जहां पर ३०,३५% से ४०% के ऊपर मुस्लिम आबादी है बहा पर गयर मुस्लिमो के लिए कोई जगह नही है यानि उन्हें उहा से पलायन कऱने के लिए मजबूर होना पड़ता है । उनका बहा पर सामूहिक नरसंहार होता है जैसे कश्मीर घाटी के अंदर हुआ है । दुनिआ के हर जगह एही हुआ है । हमें एही सच्चाई को स्वीकार करना पड़ेगा और मुझे लगता है की अगर हम इस सच्चाई को स्वीकार नही करेंगे तो जनता के आँखों में धूल झोंक रहे है और देश के खिलाफ गद्दारी कर रहे है । जितना भी गयर मुस्लिम है, भारत में हिन्दू है तो हिन्दू, दुनिया के अंदर यहाँ कहीं और भी…. अन्य जाति के लोग है उन सव का वजुद खतरे में है, और एह अब तक का ट्रेंड पूरी दुनिया और देश से अंदर देखने को मिला है । हम ने इस बात को स्पस्ट किया है । बहुत ब्यापक अध्यन के बाद इस निष्कर्ष पर हमलोग पहुंचें है । और हम इस बात को फिर दाबे के साथ कहते हैं, यह हो रहा है, हुआ है । हिन्दू बहुल्य क्षेत्र में मुस्लिम सुरक्षित है, अन्य सभी जातियाँ सुरक्षित है । हर मत हर मजहब के लोग सुरक्षित है । लेकिन मुस्लिम बहुल क्षेत्र में कोई भी सुरक्षित नही हैं ।

   C Joy Raj

   LikeLike

   Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.