*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.
PTI | New Delhi | Sept 7, 2021:: A priest cannot be treated as Bhumiswami (owner of land) and the deity is the owner of the land attached to a temple, the Supreme Court has ruled.
A Bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and A. S. Bopanna said the ‘pujari’, or priest, only holds the land for the purpose of management of the property of the temple.
“In the ownership column, the name of the deity alone is required to be mentioned, as the deity being a juristic person is the owner of the land. The occupation of the land is also by the deity which is carried out by the servant or the managers on behalf of the deity. Therefore, the name of the manager or that of the priest is not required to be mentioned in the column of occupier as well,” the top court said on Monday.
It added that the law is clear on the distinction that the pujari is not a Kashtkar Mourushi, (tenant in cultivation) or a government lessee or an ordinary tenant of the maufi lands (land exempted from payment of revenue) but holds such land on behalf of the Aukaf Department (relating to ‘Devasthan) for the purpose of management.
“The pujari is only a grantee to manage the property of the deity and such grant can be reassumed if the pujari fails to do the task assigned to him, i.e, to offer prayers and manage the land. He cannot be thus treated as a Bhumiswami,” the Bench said.
“We do not find any mandate in any of the judgments to hold that the name of pujari or manager is required to be mentioned in the revenue record, the Bench said.
It said that the name of the Collector as manager cannot be recorded in respect of property vested in the deity as the Collector cannot be a manager of all temples unless it is a temple vested with the State.
The apex court was hearing an appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh challenging an order of High Court which quashed two circulars issued by the State government under the M.P. Law Revenue Code, 1959 (Code).
These circulars ordered deletion of the names of pujari from the revenue record so as to protect the temple properties from unauthorised sale by the priests.
Read this news in Bengali: পুরোহিত নন, মন্দিরের সম্পত্তির মালিক দেবতাই, জানিয়ে দিল সুপ্রিম কোর্ট
Read this news in Hindi: मंदिर के नाम संपत्ति के मालिक देवता ही होते हैं, पुजारी नहींः सुप्रीम कोर्ट
Courtesy: The Hindu | Sangbad Pratidin | Aaj Tak.
Donation For Hindu Existence Forum
Donation for supporting Hindu Existence Forum's research works on Hindutva Strategies, Cultural and Traditional proliferation and Global Peace.
ABVP Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha Amit Shah Anti Hindu Mamata Banerjee Awami League Baba Ramdev Bajrang Dal Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Bharat Sevashram Sangha. BJP Calcutta High Court CONGRESS Dr. Subramanian Swamy Dr Pravin Togadia Dr Subramanian Swamy (BJP) Hindu Existence Forum HINDU JANAJAGRUTI SAMITI Hindu Janajagruti Samiti (HJS) Hindu Persecution in Bangladesh Hindu Persecution in Pakistan Hindu Samhati ISKCON Love Jihad Mamata Banerjee Mohan Bhagwat Narendra Modi National Investigation Agency (NIA) Pakistan PM Modi Rajnath Singh Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) RSS RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat Sanatan Sanstha Shiv Sena Sri Ram Sena Supreme Court of India Uniform Civil Code Upananda Brahmachari UP CM Yogi Adityanath VHP Vishwa Hindu Parishad Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) WB CM Mamata Banerjee YOGI ADITYANATH
Membership Form Link for “Ekam Sanatan Bharat” ('एकम सनातन भारत' दल का फाउंडर मेंबर बनने के लिए निम्न वेबसाइट पर…
How to get membership of ekam sanatan bharat party
Bhagwan raam randee ka bhacha. Bhagwan seeta randee kee choot mein lund. Bhagwan krishna ke maa ki choot mein lund.…
Congress is anti-Hindu.... and also anti-Indian. No one in his right mind should vote for it.