Day-to-Day Hearing in Ayodhya matter needs in SC if Mediation Fails.

SC seeks status report on mediation proceedings by July 18…

If Mediation Fails, Day-to-Day Hearing in Ayodhya Row: Supreme Court.

IANS | New Delhi | July 11, 2019:: If mediation fails, then the Supreme Court may begin day-to-day hearing in the Ayodhya dispute, said the apex court on Thursday while hearing an application filed by one of the parties representing the Hindu community.

The application was moved on Tuesday by Gopal Singh Visharad to list the dispute for adjudication saying there had been no progress in the mediation process.

His counsel and senior advocate P.S. Narasimha mentioned the matter before a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta and Aniruddha Bose.

The counsels representing the Hindu parties contended that the dispute had been pending for 69 years and the nature of mediation deployed to resolve the row did not appear to be heading in a positive direction.

“Eleven joint sessions have been held, but it seems inconclusive… Difficult to sort out through mediation,” contended the counsel.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing one of the Muslim litigants, said the application was an attempt to scrap the mediation process and the counsels of Hindu parties were not fair in criticizing the methodology of the committee set up to resolve the Ayodhya row.

A Constitution bench headed by Gogoi called for a report from the committee regarding the progress on mediation. If it is observed that there is no progress, then day-to-day hearing can begin from July 25.

Narasimha contended that not much progress had been made in the first round of the mediation process, which was initiated by the top court.

The court allowed him to file the application and said it will see to his plea for listing.

On May 10, the Supreme Court extended the term of the mediation committee till August 15.

The court said the members of the committee were not experiencing any difficulty in the mediation process.

It observed that the Chairman of the committee, former Supreme Court judge F.M.I. Kalifulla had indicated progress in mediation and sought an extension of time to complete the task.

The court refused to divulge the details on the mediation efforts.

The court observed that the mediation process can be extended if required. The court’s observation came after a report was submitted on the mediation efforts.

Read also:: ‘Good News From Supreme Court’, Says Dr Subramanian Swamy On Possibility Of Day-to-day Hearings In Top Court On Decades-old Ayodhya Dispute.

Senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for one of the Muslim litigants, told the court that they have no objection to the mediation process taking time.

Iqbal Ansari, the son of Muslim litigant Hashim Ansari in the Ayodhya case, said: “This matter is very old and the issue cannot be resolved in two months.”

The Kalifulla panel has Art of Living founder Sri Sri Ravi Shankar and senior advocate Shriram Panchu as its other members.

The mediation is taking place at Faizabad, close to Ayodhya.

The other judges on the Supreme Court bench were Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer.

…

Courtesy: India dot Com.

2 comments on “Day-to-Day Hearing in Ayodhya matter needs in SC if Mediation Fails.”

1. Lal Gehi

   July 11, 2019

   

   WHY HINDUS HAVE TO STRUGGLE TO RESTORE THE HINDU TEMPLE, IN THEIR OWN HOME, BHARAT ( Hindustan ), WHICH WAS DESTROYED BY INVADERS AND OCCUPIERS. ?!!

   This is nothing but ignorance, hypocrisy of Indian style democracy, and impotence of 80% Hindus of Hindustan.!
   IMAGINE,….YOU CAN NOT CONSTRUCT A MUSLIM MASJID, IN MUSLIM COUNTRY OR SAUDI ARABIA.!!

   Har Har Mahadev

   Trishool

   LikeLiked by 1 person

   Reply
2. impex1

   July 11, 2019

   

   Shri Upnanda Ji 11th. July 2019

   Is it a Supreme or a Mockery. What mediation? Prayag High Court given judgement after examining the facts on the ground.

   Court suppose to examine other facts other than already examined considered in the Prayag High court judgement. Muslims are Trespassers. Hindus have right to throw them out not only from the temple rather from the country. Saudi Arabia have vast waste land with Sand Dunes, Date Tree with Camels and lot of money. Muslim can go there and make Babari Masjid again. I don’t think Saudi king will like that. He may be interested to make a masjid after his name. Then migrated muslim can file the petition Saudi Court and screw themselves.

   CJI have No GUTS. Let’s Try the Case in Military Court. MF Babar was a Foreign Combatant. Combatants are tried in Military Courts. Military Court will hang the Muslim Applicants right away.

   JaiHind

   Upnanda ji talk to me. I am not looking for Gold Medals, No Political aspirations, No Important seat. Nothing of this sort. I told my Son to submerge my ashes in the Atlantic Ocean. Ram Ram.

   I visited India last in 2005. My mom given her flat to someone homeless as kindness for 6 months. He become the owner of the Flat worth 2 Crore in Mayour Vihar Delhi. My mom died fighting the case in Delhi Court. Now I have to wait for Dharmraj Yudhishthar to decide the case. Congress made India really Mahaan.

   But I still want Hindus must keep fighting to save the Hindu Nation.

   Jaihind

   Anand, Madan

   > WordPress.com

   LikeLike

   Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Δ

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.