How to get membership of ekam sanatan bharat party
Struggle for Hindu Existence
*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.
Hindu lawyer Raj Gaurav seeks stay on release of film Adipurush in a Delhi court.
Why the BJP man Prasoon Joshi, CBFC Chairperson is indulging all anti-Hindu materials and manners in such nasty Bollywood films? Need of a Sanatan Censor Board surfacing.
Plea seeks stay on release of film Adipurush, alleges wrong portrayal of Lord Rama, Hanuman and Ravan to hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus.
Upendra Bharti | HENB | New Delhi | Oct 8, 2022:: A plea seeking stay on the release of Prabhas, Saif Ali Khan and Kriti Sanon starer movie Adipurush has been moved in a Delhi Court.
The plea alleged that Lord Rama and Hanuman are portrayed in an unwarranted and inaccurate depiction of wearing leather straps. It also said that Ravana has been shown in a wrong appearance.
The plea has been moved by advocate Raj Gaurav against Bhushan Kumar and Om Raut, the producer and director of the film. The plea has been listed for Monday for hearing before Senior Civil Judge Abhishek Kumar of Tees Hazari Court.
It has been alleged that in the trailer of the movie character of Lord Rama, Hanuman and Ravana has been shown in a manner that hurt the religious sentiments of the applicant and many others.
It has been claimed that the defendants have hurt the religious, cultural, historical and civilizational sentiments of the plaintiff and many other Hindus by depicting Lord Rama and Hanuman in an unwarranted and inaccurate way in the teaser/promo video of their upcoming movie Adipurush).
“Lord Rama is shown as an angry man on a killing spree. Lord Hanuman and Lord Rama are also shown wearing leather accessories in a teaser uploaded on the YouTube page of the producer,” the plea said.
As per the Hindu faith, lord Rama is portrayed to be a calm, magnanimous and seren figure but the defendant has tried to portray Lord Rama as an angry fighter. The picture of Lord Rama has been portrayed in the Constitution of India where he is shown as calm and composed, the plea stated.
It is submitted that Rama being a manifestation of God in human form has always been portrayed to be an adorning crown on his head along with Lord Lakshmana and goddess Sita even when they were in exile. But the defendant has been portrayed in a bad manner by showing him without a crown and without having tilaka on his forehead.
The plea said the character of Ravana played by actor Saif Ali Khan has been shown to be awfully cheap and appalling to the real traits of Ravana. Ravana has been shown to have boy-cut, crewcut hairstyle with blade marks over the ears. He is shown to be riding a bat, the plea said.
It is also said that the Ravana’s character is always shown as a staunch believer and worshipper of Lord Shiva who gracefully dresses and has an identifiable moustache. He always adorns a Tilak on his forehead with a golden crown.
“He rides his magnificent Pushpak Viman. He is the one who wrote Ravan Samhita and Shiv Tandav Strotram. Although his effigy is burnt in north India on the occasion of Dussehra but at many places, he is worshipped,” the petition added.
It is also said that Ravana belongs to Sri Lanka and his traits are identifiable with one of Sri Lanka whereas the defendant in the trailer of the movie has tried to portray Ravana to be belonging to middle East Asia identifying him with one as Mughal antecedent i.e. one who invaded India. The defendant has tried to portray Ravana who was a Brahmin as a Muslim.
The petitioner has sought a permanent injunction against the trailer/promo of the movie. He also sought a direction to remove the trailer from all social media including YouTube and Facebook.
The efforts of such rackets in Bollywood for making such films to show Hindu deities, priests, saints and Hindus in general in a very bad light or in a derogatory manner for hurting Hindu sentiments are considered as a common phenomena perpetrated by the certain anti-Hindu lobbies.
But, Hindus have been protesting about it tooth and nail by boycotting such films or in way of knocking the door of judicial system.
But, it is beyond understanding what is for CBFC (Central Board of Film Certification) to give indulgence to all anti-Hindu materials and manners in such Bollywood films?
The present CBFC chairperson Prasoon Joshi is known as a BJP man who is in the helm of the affairs for releasing such ant-Hindi and even anti-national films one after another.
Recently, calling “Bollywood is anti-Hindu”, the Akhil Bharatiya Sant Samiti (ABSS), a top body of Hindu seers and religious leaders, Friday moved the demand for a Sanatan Censor Board at a meeting in New Delhi.
Criticizing the role of present CBFC Chairperson, Mahamandaleshwar Swami Yatindranand Giri, the Secretary of ABSS said, “The censor board has been ineffective and it failed to take action against anti-India and anti-Hindu narrative that is showcased through Bollywood movies. Bollywood has made a habit of depicting Hindu gods and goddesses in a poor light and also the sant samaj of the county.”
Various Hindutva organisations including Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Hindu Janajagruti Samiti and Hindu Existence Forum already have given a call to #Boycott_Adipurush, #BoycottAdipurush, #BoycottAdiPurushMovie , #BanAdipursh etc.
…
__Inputs from ANI & The Print.
3 comments on “Hindu lawyer Raj Gaurav seeks stay on release of film Adipurush in a Delhi court.”
Leave a Reply
[…] […]
Bhagwan raam randee ka bhacha. Bhagwan seeta randee kee choot mein lund. Bhagwan krishna ke maa ki choot mein lund.…
Congress is anti-Hindu.... and also anti-Indian. No one in his right mind should vote for it.
Jats are still not considered Kshatriyas event though they wore the Kohinoor and conquered Delhi, Agra, Lahore, Gwalior, Kangra and…
Struggle for Hindu Existence 
This is needful to our Hindutva
LikeLike
Pingback: Hindu attorney Raj Gaurav seeks keep on free up of movie Adipurush in a Delhi court docket.
Bharat Sarkar, since the invaders time no respect has been shown to
the values of Sanatan Bharat. The Congressy-Nehru constitution had
legalized this fact. This was the biggest atrocity Indian politicians had
brought to Sanatan Bharat. This is now the result and gives uncivlized
races – descendants of criminal foreigners – the freedom to disrespect the
nature of Bharat. This can not be accepted, therefore change the Law and
bring in new Laws defending Sanatan Bharat and it is your duty. This is
a message of Sri Hanuman Seva Sena.
LikeLike