Struggle for Hindu Existence

*Hindu Rights to Survive with Dignity & Sovereignty *Join Hindu Freedom Movement to make Bharat Hindu Rashtra within 2025 *Jai Shri Ram *Jayatu Jayatu Hindu Rashtram *Editor: Upananda Brahmachari.

As a Hindu, PM Modi must not tell a lie about Allah and Islam.

Modi Sufi

Islam a religion of peace, none of the 99 names of Allah stands for violence: PM Narendra Modi at World Sufi Forum.

PM Modi must not tell a lie about Allah. At least three names of Allah have a connection with ‘force and violence’. According to Quran, Allah is most dreadful to non-believers! Islam is not a Religion of Peace at all. 

Upananda Brahmachari | HENB | Haridwar | March 16, 2016:: In his address at the World Sufi Forum in New Delhi on Thursday, Modi said: “Sufism is the voice of peace, co-existence, compassion, equality and a call to universal brotherhood”.

As Sufism has its non-communal reputation globally in an extent of encompassing spirituality in general, we may not differ with the PM’s version as above in a primary analysis.

But, to fetch a greater applause from the Muslim audience, Modi made a big lie by saying, “When we think of 99 names of Allah, no one stands for force and violence. The first two names of Allah are compassionate and merciful. Allah is Rahman and Rahim”. Modi also described Islam as a Religion of Peace.

According to Quran, Allah is a most dangerous existence and dreadful identity to the non-believers! Allah may be ‘Rahman’ (compassionate) and ‘Rahim’ (merciful) for the Momins (Muslim believers), but Allah is most dangerous and dreadful for the Kaffirs (non-Muslim non-believers). Any interested persons may check the truth about Allah through the versions of Quran and Hadith. 

When, PM Modi preached for Allah by saying 99 names of Allah stand free from ‘force and violence’, it is clearly seen that three of Allah’s names suggest otherwise.

The 26th name Allah is Al-Mudhill (المذل), means The Humiliator. The 55th name is itself Al-Matin (المتين), means The Forceful One or Firm. The 81st name of Allah is  Al-Muntaqim (المنتقم), means The Avenger. Through further checking one can reach further illustrations of Allah with the further incitement of ‘force and violence’, but Allah is really an engrossed entity of fear, force and violence to that non-believer folks who are not ready to accept Allah or his prophet Muhammad. In most of the cases it relates whether you believe Islam or not and certainly not always according to the merits of demerits of good work or bad by anyone.

Actually, PM Modi is getting busy more and more these days and finds no time to check the texts as placed to him before delivering it in front of the august audience. Sometimes it creates confusion, humour and cranks. Modi’s effort to prove Islam as religion of peace, in the World Sufi Forum is nothing but a step to misled people while Islam and its radical concept of Jihad are destroying peace and humanity all around.

PM Modi must try to know, Islam is the only religion that has to retain its membership by formally threatening to kill anyone who leaves.  This is according to the example set by Muhammad.

Islam teaches that non-Muslims are less than fully human.  Muhammad said that Muslims can be put to death for murder, but that a Muslim could never be put to death for killing a non-Muslim.

The Quran never once speaks of Allah’s love for non-Muslims, but it speaks of Allah’s cruelty toward and hatred for non-Muslims more than 500 times.

Modi may think himself that he is a great servant to Nation, a big personality and as a Hindutvawadi he is doing some good. But, according to Islam, he is definitely a kaffir and deserves the curse, anger and punishment from Allah.

The horrible Allah is definitely described in Quran as:

Quran (5:33)“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

Quran (8:12)“I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15)“O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”

Quran (9:14)“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “healing” the hearts of Muslims.   …or….

Quran (9:29)“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam “superior over all religions.”This chapter was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths projecting its embodiment of force and violence in Allah and Muhammad.

Quran is full of such barbaric tenets of Islam, Allah and Muhammad both are deadliest threats to the human civilization. But, Modi spreads a big lie that ‘there are 99 names of Allah, no one stands for force and violence’ and ‘Islam is a Religion of Peace’.

In India most of the prominent Sufi personalities came from Arab or middle East and they played a role to expand the ‘aggressive Islam’ through many wars and spreading ‘vilification of Hinduism’.

Richard Maxwell Eaton in his well acclaimed book “Sufis Of Bijapur 1300-1700; Social Roles Of Sufis In Medieval India” (Princeton University Press. 1978) cast a light on the ‘upholders of Islamic orthodoxy’. One chapter of this book exposed the Jihadi role of Sufis in Deccan to  perpetuate the Islamic Expansionism in India.

Sufis like Sheikh Ali, Sheikh Sahid, Peer Jumna and Mainuddin Chsiti were more militant than mystic and played their pivotal role to established fundamentals of Islam without any thread of Indian concept of universal brotherhood. They were all for Islamic Ummah and hegemony rather not going for social harmony. Some of these type of Sufis were renowned as Gazi, the warrior of Islam.

Some Sufis like Rabiya, Bulleh Shah, Galib or Last Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar who tried to free their followers from the shackle of Islamic fundamentalism were actually sidelined by the major Islamic populace under the control of Shariah and fanatics.

The role of Sufis in India are not clear at all. They are more political than spiritual. At present the Sufi organisation in India are not interested to spread their so called philanthropic views in other Islamic countries or among the Jihadi mobs here to combat the Islamic terror and violence. Their sole aim is to spread Islam in their ways rather than strengthening peace and harmony.

PM Modi is quiet misled over this matter and  he must stop spreading further confusion. Moreover, as a Hindu, Modi must not tell a lie about Allah and Islam. It is shameful.

Related reading in Hindi: सूफी साहबान और नरेंद्र मोदी – शंकर शरण

Courtesy: The links and pics source used above.

6 comments on “As a Hindu, PM Modi must not tell a lie about Allah and Islam.

  1. Hindu Nastik
    March 18, 2016

    Islam means submission, not peace.

    Like submit to my rule and supremacy of Islam you filthy kafir/infidel Hindu.

    Islam is the religion that leaves families in pieces:

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx

    Like

  2. Arindam
    March 20, 2016

    Great article. Indeed, many – probably most, Sufis were fanatics, who were one of the two Islamic pincers (the ulema being the other one) aimed against Hindu society. To quote Sitaram Goel:

    ‘The sufi silsilãs which travelled to India after the advent of Muinuddin Chishti were departments of the imperialist establishment of Islam. None of these sups looked kindly at the Hindus, nor did the Hindus honour any of them with the exception of some simpletons who were taken in by the show of sufi piety, or some self-seekers who were out of curry favour with the Muslim courts with the help of sufis. Most sups were like the latter-day Christian missionaries whose animus against the Hindus is very well known. The NirguNa saints could not have been and were not impressed by them. In fact, some noted sufis are named in NirguNa poetry as shopkeepers and swindlers.’ (The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India, chapter 11).

    It is sad that Namo – like many of our earlier leaders – is deceiving the Hindus about the true nature of Islam. However, unlike the past, the presence of the internet ensures that intelligent Hindus (and other non-Muslims) will not be misled.

    Like

  3. Dirgha Raj Prasai
    March 21, 2016

    I extend thanks-the strong Hindu nationalist Party BJP. But, PM of India Sri Narendra Modi has expressed very non-analytical speech about Islam.
    There are so many confusions on Islam and its Allah and Muhammad. Humanity’s wisdom in the world’s society cannot be created unless the inequality existing between women and men is neutralized. A Muslim man can divorce his wife by oral announcements; the wife has no right to divorce at all. When a Muslim husband has pronounced divorce three times on his wife, she then may not lawfully remarry her husband until she has married another man, properly consummated the marriage and has been divorced by her new husband. When a Muslim husband has pronounced divorce three times on his wife, she then may not lawfully remarry her husband until she has married another man, properly consummated the marriage and has been divorced by her new husband. Islam teaches that a wife is subject to punishment by her husband; beating a wife or abstaining from sexual relations with her is legally allowed under Islamic Sharia.

    The situation is worse for Muslim woman in the world as compared to others. Muslim women have been suffering since their births. Salman Rushdie and Bangladesh’s Tasalima Nasari have highlighted the lopsided behavior and trends in Muslim society. These two have raised their voices on the basis of equal justice.

    Tasalima Nasarin has rebelled for women all over the world. Nasarin writes, “It is mentioned in the Muslim religious script, the Kuran that, ‘Speak the truth even if that is your opposition.

    Yes! who are Muslim- read all about the facts……….(?)
    About 950 years ago the Muslims invaded India. The Taj Mahal was a
    pre-existing structure before but it was said to be built by Shah
    Jahan. We have all heard how the Taj Mahal, which is considered one of
    the great wonders of the world, was built as the preeminent expression
    of a man’s love for a wife. That it was built by Emperor Shah Jahan in
    commemoration of his wife Mumtaz. But the truth is that the Taj Mahal
    was never built by Shah Jahan. Some say the Taj Mahal pre-dates Shah
    Jahan by several centuries and was originally built as a Hindu or
    Vedic temple/palace complex-known as-‘Tejomahalaya’ (powerfull Siva),
    the Hindu King Jai Singh. We can find ‘OM’ and various Vedic prints in
    the entarnal wall of that Tejomahalaya.

    In this context, Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has
    been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj
    Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz’s tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of
    Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ). In the course of his
    research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by
    Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court
    chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally
    beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz’s
    burial.The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for
    surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as
    a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice
    among Muslim rulers. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and
    architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal
    being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in
    the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan’s time and are
    still inaccessible to the public. Prof. Oak asserts they contain a
    headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for
    worship rituals in Hindu temples

    Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside
    doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300
    years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert
    Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz’s
    death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes
    no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter
    Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death,
    also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah
    Jahan’s time.’

    This is not unlike the many other buildings that were acquired by the
    Muslim invaders to be used for their own purposes. The point to
    consider is how much more of India’s history has been distorted if the
    background of such a grand building is so inaccurate. The evidence
    that shows the Taj Mahal and many other buildings may not have been of
    Muslim origin.

    ‘The architecture is definitely of Hindu orientation and could very
    well have been designed as a Shiva temple; the issue of the arch and
    the dome; how the invader Timurlung (1398) took back thousands of
    prisoner craftsmen to build his capital at Samarkhand and where the
    dome could have been incorporated into Islamic architecture; how it
    was not Shah Jahan’s religious tolerance that could have been a reason
    for Hindu elements in the design of the Taj.’- Stephen Knapp,
    http://www.stephen-knapp.com I think- the automatic falling the droops of
    water managed for the Lord Shiva who converted after for the queen
    Shah Jahan’s body.

    There is a popular rule in Islam to allow for marrying four times. The Great man Hajarat Muhammad was married fourteen times. Hajarat Muhammad had said, “A Husband can leave a wife for four reasons.” (1) If a wife declines from hearing when her husband beckons her to come with him after beautification, (2) If she declines from accepting husband’s call to lay with him, (3) If she abandons her female duty and reads of doxology,(4) and if she leaves to visit another person’s home without her husband’s consent. The Muslim society needs to abolish such inhumane order without keeping any prejudice. Then, how, we can say- the PM Narendra Modi is telling a lie about Allah and Islam. It is not shameful, Modi is one of the studies personality. He always speaks truth and always honors the Muslim and Christian as a true and strong Hinduist in India, So, I always regard him as a
    Hindu warrior.
    Yes! Search Google and read >Hinduism in Nepal by D.R.Prasai<
    Thank you
    Dirgha Raj Prasai
    Kathmandu, Nepal

    Like

  4. Dr Naidoo
    March 21, 2016

    When will a Hindu organisation in India ever organise an international conference on Islam? The conference must include some of the most prominent Muslim scholars in the world today.

    If I am invited to such a conference I will ask some questions that will help to place Islam in its proper context for the purpose of clarification of its position on what true religion is.

    The most important question will face the important issue of Islam’s presence in India.

    If India has given the world the greatest religious teachers ever born on earth what precisely are Islam and Christianity doing in India?

    T. Naidoo

    Like

  5. skanda987
    March 24, 2016

    Politicians lie; but I did not expect Modiji to do so.

    Religions can be compared objectively to find which one is better for personal , national, and global happiness. A short article at below link shows ho to do it.
    https://skanda987.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/religions-and-religious-freedom_paper.pdf

    A couple of universities could be engaged also to do the same.

    Any way, Islam has invaded in Hindustan by force, so it does not belong there.
    After the 1947 partition, Islam has no reason to be kept in Hindustan.
    jai sri krishna!

    Like

  6. Dr Naidoo
    April 12, 2016

    Prime Minister must ask the Muslim world to explain precisely who Allah is.

    Allah is a being about whom the world knows absolutely nothing.

    Who precisely is this being who brought into existence a religion for Muslims only?

    Is such a thing possible?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

HinduExistence Editor in Facebook

Upananda at Twitter

%d bloggers like this: